Posted by Julie Granka on December 16, 2014 in DNA Tech, Science, Uncategorized

Passed down through the generations, fragments of the genomes of long-gone ancestors exist today in the genomes of their living descendants.

Those fragments can actually be used to recover parts of those ancestors’ genomes – without having to resort to some more morbid techniques for obtaining their DNA.  That means a potentially easier way for you to be able to trace your freckles, for example, back to a particular ancestor.

The AncestryDNA science team is excited to unveil new developments in the science of ancestral human genome reconstruction using genetic data of living people. Using an approach similar to reassembling a document that has been shredded, we have attributed an unprecedented proportion of a human genome to a 19th Century American and his two successive wives using the genome-wide genetic material of their descendants.

This scientific feat is a step forward in the use of consumer genetics in family history.

Diving deeper

Attributing pieces of DNA from living individuals to a particular ancestor requires both pedigree data in addition to genetic data – and lots of both.  AncestryDNA, with over half a million DNA samples and over 60 million family trees, was thus in a unique position to attempt it.

For all pairs of individuals in the member database, AncestryDNA determines whether they “share” DNA; that is, share a haplotype that is nearly identical likely because they likely both inherited it from a common ancestor.  Then, we leverage our database of member family trees to search for their shared ancestors.

Recently, we released a new statistical algorithm that integrates these two analyses to identify groups of likely descendants of a particular ancestor.  These groups, called DNA Circles™, are sets of individuals who all share DNA with one another and all have a particular individual as their most recent common ancestor. To date, we have identified over 150,000 DNA Circles – connecting groups of descendants of over 150,000 distant ancestors.

To prove out the task of genome reconstruction, we used DNA Circles to first identify a set of individuals with pedigree and genetic evidence to suggest that they were likely descendants of a man named David Speegle, born in the early 1800’s in Alabama.


Image obtained from
Image obtained from

Why David Speegle?  With many children between his two successive marriages to wives Nancy and Winifred, Mr. Speegle and his spouses were excellent candidates for reconstruction.  That’s because having lots of children means having a large number of living descendants potentially carrying pieces of their DNA.

Validating the statistical methods underlying DNA Circles, Ancestry family historian Crista Cowan conducted extensive genealogical research, verifying that the individuals in David Speegle’s DNA Circle were indeed his descendants.  In the process, she also discovered how most of them were related to one another genealogically.

The science team then applied two different statistical models of genetic inheritance to these identified genetic and genealogical relationships.  They were able to infer, with a high degree of confidence, which parts of David, Nancy, and Winifred’s genomes were passed down to these descendants – thereby piecing together parts of their genomes.

Developed by the science team in-house, the first method used is a computational algorithm that efficiently identifies and stitches together chunks of DNA from a set of ancestors (like David, Winifred, and Nancy) given genetic data shared among their descendants. Unlike the first method, the second approach requires a pedigree linking all descendants and uses methods specifically designed in the academic research community for inferring inheritance of DNA in family trees.

Our discoveries

Both methods showed strong agreement in identifying DNA segments that could be attributed to the Speegle family ancestors and used to piece together portions of their genomes. For example, they identified pieces of the genome indicating that potentially David Speegle or his spouses had a version of a gene attributed to a higher likelihood of having male pattern baldness. And while Mr. Speegle did not likely pass down versions of the genes for darker hair or freckles to his descendants, he did likely pass along the version of a gene needed for blue eyes.

In addition to these selected traits, for nearly half of the length of the human genome the team was able to find representation of at least one of the copies of the genomes of David, Nancy, and Winifred Speegle.  And, because David Speegle had two wives, for roughly 12% of the length of the genome the team was able to identify genomic material that likely belonged to David Speegle himself.

These proportions are remarkable considering the number of generations separating Speegle from his descendants – an average of over six generations (that’s your great-great-great-great grandparent!).  The fact that the team could reach these numbers attests to the power of AncestryDNA’s massive dataset – and its power as it continues to grow. 

Although we’re still refining our methods for reconstructing pieces of the genome of human ancestors from genetic material from their descendants, we’re excited about the implications of this research in genetic genealogy and in the genomics industry. Future insights gained may come in the form of tracing the source of particular traits in a population, reaching a better understanding of recent population history, and enabling more targeted genetic genealogy research.

The new DNA Circles experience and the genome reconstruction project are just a fraction of the AncestryDNA science team’s ongoing research efforts to further personalize findings from big data. By leveraging AncestryDNA’s continually expanding database of DNA samples paired with Ancestry family tree data, the team will continue to innovate to provide unique insights to both consumers and the scientific community — potentially even elucidating the genetic makeup of many more distant ancestors.

Julie Granka

Julie has been a population geneticist at AncestryDNA since May 2013. Before that, Julie received her Ph.D. in Biology and M.S. in Statistics from Stanford University, where she studied genetic data from human populations and developed computational tools to answer questions about population history and evolution. She also spent time collecting and studying DNA using spit-collection tubes like the ones in an AncestryDNA kit. Julie likes to spend her non-computer time enjoying the outdoors – hiking, biking, running, swimming, camping, and picnicking. But if she’s inside, she’s baking, drawing, and painting.


  1. James Pilkinton

    This is really interesting, mostly since it applies directly to me (as David Speegle was my Gr-gr-grandfather). I have enjoyed participating in Autosomal DNA from the beginning and really look forward to each new discovery. Keep up the great work. BTW all the Speegle descendants that I knew were blue eyed (especially my father) and many of the men were bald.

  2. Angela Skelton

    I’m utterly fascinated with this information! I am a direct female descendant of David Speegle. My dad, a direct male descendant, has green eyes, and is not losing his hair. Isn’t it great how DNA comes together? I truly enjoy all of these new discoveries, so good job!

  3. Teresa Devine

    David Speegle and his wife Winifred were my 3x great grandparents on my mother’s side. My mother has green eyes but both my brother and me have blue eyes; plus my brother is bald. This is very interesting but can you use it to identify David’s mother? That is a question that has not been adequately answered or documented.

    Oh, and David was likely born in North Carolina not Alabama. The family moved to the area while it was still the Mississippi Territory.

  4. What: ROOTS TECH Educational Workshop, 2015
    Where: Salt Lake City, Utah, Convention Center.
    Date: Thursday, February 12th, 2015
    Speaker: Scott Haskins, Conservator & Author
    Time: 3:00 pm
    Room: Ballroom #E

    Going to RootsTech 2015?!
    SIGNUP for Educational WORKSHOP # RT1848, “Save Your Stuff” with SCOTT HASKINS, renown Fine Art Conservator & Author. Learn how to preserve and save one-of-a-kind treasured family history documents, books, photos, and other memorabilia! WORKSHOP is FREE! *Seating for 400 People ONLY

    p.s.  A FREE download of a 206 page book “Save Your Stuff – Collection Care Tips ” is a now available. The $27 multimedia e-book has over 30 videos, lots of photos and more.  Click on the link.

    *Feel free to SHARE this Link with your Friends or Group!

Join the Discussion

We really do appreciate your feedback, and ask that you please be respectful to other commenters and authors. Any abusive comments may be moderated. For help with a specific problem, please contact customer service.