Comments on: Surrey Parish Records 1538-1987 – now online http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2013/05/30/4327/ The official Ancestry.co.uk blog Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:45:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: David Matthewhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2013/05/30/4327/#comment-3694 David Matthew Sun, 02 Jun 2013 01:35:24 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=4327#comment-3694 I see that even the burial entry for Barnes Wallis is wrongly transcribed above, his middle name was Neville, it is quite clear in the entry!.

]]>
By: Peter Heatherhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2013/05/30/4327/#comment-3690 Peter Heather Fri, 31 May 2013 16:18:03 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=4327#comment-3690 Apart from the usual standard of transcription I’ve come to expect from Ancestry (7 out of 8 of the records that I eventually managed to find were mistranscribed – in one case the surname Temple was transcribed as Joseph! They were all perfectly legible on the original), I presume that this is only an initial start at putting the registers online. Very few parishes appear to have had the marriage registers between 1754 and 1812 transcribed or even the images put online.

]]>