AUTHORED BY LAURA DANSBURY (FROM ANCESTRY.COM)
Record images are the foundation of your family history, and we want to create a rich viewing experience that will bring these historical documents to life. The new Interactive Image Viewer (currently in beta) includes interactive tools to help you view and interpret the information on the record as well as navigation controls that make it easy to focus on the part of the image you’re interested in. The Interactive Image Viewer is a work in progress; we are still adding new features and functionality. We value your suggestions for improving the viewer.

This beta viewer is available for the following censuses:
It will be available for the 1930 US Federal Census in the near future.
You can access the interactive image beta viewer from the record page by clicking on “View Interactive Image (BETA).”
Please use the “Send comments” link at the top of the viewer.


Highlights help you find people quickly by automatically highlighting the entire household. This is most useful when there are multiple families on one image.
By hovering over various cells, you can see a transcription of that cell and learn more about the facts in the record. Simply hover your mouse over an element of the record and a text tip appears.
When you zoom in on an image, names labels will appear on the left side of the viewer so you can see exactly whose information you’re viewing.
The new image viewer has many features that are similar to the Advanced Image Viewer many of you are already using. We’ve also added some new features.
We have also added some new options under the “Image” menu (below the Save button).
Use the Actions menu to print, view record source, remove highlighting, and more. Please note that this interactive image viewer is still in beta and some of the features you may be used to seeing are not available yet.

Thank you for your input and suggestions on the beta version of the interactive image viewer. We will be making many updates to this viewer in the upcoming weeks to add more new features and the other “coming soon” features listed above.
I have tried looking for Mary Gillette highlighted above but there is no Beta-view available, it is ironical that the image has two persons both of whom were wrongly transcribed!.
I like the fact, when you zoom in on a column and you can know longer see each individuals name, that there is a computer generated list of all the names so you know which row is which person. A useful feature when you have numerous individuals on a page.
I don’t see anything in this release, I can say I don’t like or I won’t use.
Any plans on removing the hidden infirmity column in future census releases? FMP has removed it.
I have now found the Beta-version link.In regard to Gerald’s note about the infirmity column this restriction was an Information Commissioner’s Office instruction when the rest of the census was released by FMP on behalf of The National Archives (TNA)in advance of the 100-year release. It is unlikely that ancestry would have been given an unredacted version like FMP who were the chosen company to transcribe and release the information. In other words ancestry would need to get an updated version from TNA which would include the birth-places that were covered-up (wrongly) and not fully transcribed when they received the redacted copy from TNA.
Upon checking the information it is very disappointing that there are so many pieces of the Welsh census not transcribed and made available and the lack of information on this.
I am against this new Beta-version as it has the unaltered version, so when researchers have put in amendments then they are not reflected on the screen but on the previous index page. This means the information in the cell is wrong and I do not see why researchers should have to amend the information again and I am sure that with technology that it is possible to get the original transcription altered. As I have already mentioned I believe that it is pointless developing an old and out-of-date redacted version from The National Archives and not the completely-released version that went out on FMP last month.
David, I agree with you on the point of “amendments” (i.e. corrections made by users to Ancestry’s shoddy transcriptions!). These need to be made available to the viewer. Or, better still, Ancestry could abandon their arrogant “we are never wrong” attitude and correct the transcriptions themselves!
This is so complicated and is likely to put people off and given the errors in the 1911 census transcriptions I would like to see ancestry to put their efforts into getting the census transcriptions right.