<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advent Calendar Challenge &#8211; Day 1 answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 01:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=3114#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get the Advent Calendar to work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get the Advent Calendar to work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annabel Reeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Annabel Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=3114#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>One of our Facebook fans rightly pointed out that if you follow the family back to 1871, you will see that they had a son, Arther, in around 1865. It seems that no matter how often we remind ourselves not to make assumptions, even the most experienced of us are still guilty from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our Facebook fans rightly pointed out that if you follow the family back to 1871, you will see that they had a son, Arther, in around 1865. It seems that no matter how often we remind ourselves not to make assumptions, even the most experienced of us are still guilty from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=3114#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>Hi

Thank you for asking a question about my Great Great Grandmother yesterday.  The answer to your question was John from that Census, but from previous cenus returns you will see he wasn&#039;t her eldest son. That was Arthur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Thank you for asking a question about my Great Great Grandmother yesterday.  The answer to your question was John from that Census, but from previous cenus returns you will see he wasn&#8217;t her eldest son. That was Arthur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenuk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/12/02/advent-calendar-challenge-day-1-answer/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>lenuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=3114#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>Well that well and truly trashed the Facebook page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that well and truly trashed the Facebook page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
