<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Temporary Site Problem with Search Functionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Salter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Salter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>Thanks &#039;k&#039;. I thought I remembered there was a way of doing it but couldn&#039;t find it. Interestingly I had already submitted this as a question to the technical support team but still haven&#039;t had a reply. Thanks again. Chris Salter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8216;k&#8217;. I thought I remembered there was a way of doing it but couldn&#8217;t find it. Interestingly I had already submitted this as a question to the technical support team but still haven&#8217;t had a reply. Thanks again. Chris Salter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Robert garratt- if you double click on the &quot;Search Tab&quot; wait for the page to change. to the right hand side click on &quot;Old or New Search&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert garratt- if you double click on the &#8220;Search Tab&#8221; wait for the page to change. to the right hand side click on &#8220;Old or New Search&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Salter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Salter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>I have a problem that I assume is related to the same issue. Suddenly the data entry screen for census and E&amp;W BMD Indexes changed whilst I was logged in. I don&#039;t know if this is a permanent change but it is certainly not as good as the old style search and has seriously slowed my research. Same question as Bob above - why can&#039;t we have the old style search that worked very well?  Chris Salter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem that I assume is related to the same issue. Suddenly the data entry screen for census and E&amp;W BMD Indexes changed whilst I was logged in. I don&#8217;t know if this is a permanent change but it is certainly not as good as the old style search and has seriously slowed my research. Same question as Bob above &#8211; why can&#8217;t we have the old style search that worked very well?  Chris Salter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert garratt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert garratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me why i can`t return to the old style search as I prefer that type of searching.
Thanks Bob Garratt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me why i can`t return to the old style search as I prefer that type of searching.<br />
Thanks Bob Garratt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Shires</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>John Shires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>I still cannot merge records onto Family Tree Maker which renders it useless. This is particularly annoying on the new West Yorkshire records which has lots of content I want to merge onto my records. I did an email to customer services about 5 days ago which has gone unanswered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still cannot merge records onto Family Tree Maker which renders it useless. This is particularly annoying on the new West Yorkshire records which has lots of content I want to merge onto my records. I did an email to customer services about 5 days ago which has gone unanswered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Petley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Petley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding a problem with the wrong year being returned on GRO searches.
Marjorie E Downton born 2Q 1911, Dartford was returned as born in 1915;
John Lavarack born 2Q 1911, Hendon was returned as born in 1915.
I haven&#039;t seen this sort of error before, and the discrepancy is the same for both people. Has it been introduced by the outage described above?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding a problem with the wrong year being returned on GRO searches.<br />
Marjorie E Downton born 2Q 1911, Dartford was returned as born in 1915;<br />
John Lavarack born 2Q 1911, Hendon was returned as born in 1915.<br />
I haven&#8217;t seen this sort of error before, and the discrepancy is the same for both people. Has it been introduced by the outage described above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Will you PLEASE learn the difference between GMT and BST.  Your update was posted at 12:00am BST not 12:00am GMT which is still 40 minutes in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you PLEASE learn the difference between GMT and BST.  Your update was posted at 12:00am BST not 12:00am GMT which is still 40 minutes in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Moy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/06/30/temporary-site-problem-with-search-functionality/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Moy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2408#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Still having problems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still having problems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
