<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Trees: We&#8217;re giving you control of family merges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette Terrill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette Terrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 18:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>These changes are great, all we need now is to be able to print the family sheet, Perfect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These changes are great, all we need now is to be able to print the family sheet, Perfect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Schibli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Schibli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>fantastic help this is, well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fantastic help this is, well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 10:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Already found this feature very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already found this feature very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Howlett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 22:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Fantastic improvement but I wish it had been there about 4 years ago !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic improvement but I wish it had been there about 4 years ago !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>This improvement is long overdue and too late to be of much help to me, but it is nonetheless welcome and will I&#039;m sure be appreciated by many users.

I agree with previous posters about the failure of the system to always pick up other family members, something that can happen for example when some members of a family are staying away from the family home on census night (their relationships are then shown as being to the head of the household rather than to the head of their own family). Perhaps one day it will be possible to add other members of a household using this facility, regardless of whether or not they are shown as sons, daughters, spouses etc on the schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This improvement is long overdue and too late to be of much help to me, but it is nonetheless welcome and will I&#8217;m sure be appreciated by many users.</p>
<p>I agree with previous posters about the failure of the system to always pick up other family members, something that can happen for example when some members of a family are staying away from the family home on census night (their relationships are then shown as being to the head of the household rather than to the head of their own family). Perhaps one day it will be possible to add other members of a household using this facility, regardless of whether or not they are shown as sons, daughters, spouses etc on the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>I agree with Simon the act of adding both parents for a large bunch of kids can be a bind. But this new option is a real advance which I wish was around a year ago. Well done, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Simon the act of adding both parents for a large bunch of kids can be a bind. But this new option is a real advance which I wish was around a year ago. Well done, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>I noticed this the other day - handy.

Sometimes, however, it fails to pick up other family members and I have to add all the children individually and then add the parents individually to each child - which could surely be better automated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this the other day &#8211; handy.</p>
<p>Sometimes, however, it fails to pick up other family members and I have to add all the children individually and then add the parents individually to each child &#8211; which could surely be better automated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Horvath</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Horvath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Great,just has my subscription is coming to an end :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great,just has my subscription is coming to an end :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheila mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/05/04/family-trees-were-giving-you-control-of-family-merges/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>sheila mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 11:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=2216#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>this will be a great addition, had to ignore some records in the past as they kept insisting it was a new person and i couldnt adjust it,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this will be a great addition, had to ignore some records in the past as they kept insisting it was a new person and i couldnt adjust it,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
