<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Historic Property Prices Revealed Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/01/12/london-historic-property-prices-revealed-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/01/12/london-historic-property-prices-revealed-online/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Rimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/01/12/london-historic-property-prices-revealed-online/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Rimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1541#comment-768</guid>
		<description>It should be pointed out that this database only includes the City of London (i.e. the business district) and Paddington, so the vast majority of people who lived in London are not included. 

  I found entries for my 2xg-grandfather but that is just because his company had offices in the City. 

 The adverts for this database on ancestry&#039;s front page are extremely misleading as they imply that it covers the whole of London.  

 The current data comes from The National Archives&#039; collection reference IR91.  I hope ancestry are planning to extend the database to include the rest of London, which is in collection reference IR58 at The National Archives.  I&#039;m sure it would be much more popular with the World Archives Project keyers than this project was as we would be keying details of ordinary residents rather than companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be pointed out that this database only includes the City of London (i.e. the business district) and Paddington, so the vast majority of people who lived in London are not included. </p>
<p>  I found entries for my 2xg-grandfather but that is just because his company had offices in the City. </p>
<p> The adverts for this database on ancestry&#8217;s front page are extremely misleading as they imply that it covers the whole of London.  </p>
<p> The current data comes from The National Archives&#8217; collection reference IR91.  I hope ancestry are planning to extend the database to include the rest of London, which is in collection reference IR58 at The National Archives.  I&#8217;m sure it would be much more popular with the World Archives Project keyers than this project was as we would be keying details of ordinary residents rather than companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention London Historic Property Prices Revealed Online -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2011/01/12/london-historic-property-prices-revealed-online/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention London Historic Property Prices Revealed Online -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1541#comment-736</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ancestry.co.uk. Ancestry.co.uk said: London Historic Property Prices Revealed Online: To kick-start the year in style and provide our beloved members... http://bit.ly/gWIL1h [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ancestry.co.uk. Ancestry.co.uk said: London Historic Property Prices Revealed Online: To kick-start the year in style and provide our beloved members&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/gWIL1h" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/gWIL1h</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
