<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Tree Maker for Mac is Here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/11/22/family-tree-maker-for-mac-is-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/11/22/family-tree-maker-for-mac-is-here/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Platform For Mac &#124; Blogging For Passive Profits</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/11/22/family-tree-maker-for-mac-is-here/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Platform For Mac &#124; Blogging For Passive Profits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1428#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>[...] for mac[/affmage] [affmage source=&quot;clickbank&quot; results=&quot;5&quot;]blogging platform for mac[/affmage]  If you ever took part in the debate Windows versus Mac, you probably have already ideas clear on yo...s. Many people are very biased towards one platform and if you are in the opposite it will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for mac[/affmage] [affmage source=&quot;clickbank&quot; results=&quot;5&quot;]blogging platform for mac[/affmage]  If you ever took part in the debate Windows versus Mac, you probably have already ideas clear on yo&#8230;s. Many people are very biased towards one platform and if you are in the opposite it will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Newton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/11/22/family-tree-maker-for-mac-is-here/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1428#comment-655</guid>
		<description>I am already a premium member of Ancestry.co.uk. Will the 6 months free subscription be added on to the end of my current membership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am already a premium member of Ancestry.co.uk. Will the 6 months free subscription be added on to the end of my current membership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Trueman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/11/22/family-tree-maker-for-mac-is-here/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Trueman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1428#comment-654</guid>
		<description>You make reference to a migration feature to convert to/from a Mac. Am I right in saying that this isn&#039;t on-the-fly, but rather in order to run on the opposite OS, and in many cases, replace existing databases?

What I&#039;d like to know is: with home LANs being common place today, many will be hoping for a Mac version that can open/edit the same files as Windows, thus enabling the use of the same files on both platforms without conversion. When is this likely to happen, as for many it will be the only practical solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make reference to a migration feature to convert to/from a Mac. Am I right in saying that this isn&#8217;t on-the-fly, but rather in order to run on the opposite OS, and in many cases, replace existing databases?</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like to know is: with home LANs being common place today, many will be hoping for a Mac version that can open/edit the same files as Windows, thus enabling the use of the same files on both platforms without conversion. When is this likely to happen, as for many it will be the only practical solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
