<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Do You Think You Are? &#8211; Alan Cumming&#8217;s difficult journey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nursing schools</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>nursing schools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Great information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlene O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlene O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I also agree that it would have been impossible to fire this weapon at such an angle into the back of his head.
Popularity breeds contempt and this man obviously had an enemy who used this firearm to dispose of him.
Russian Roulette BALDERDASH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree that it would have been impossible to fire this weapon at such an angle into the back of his head.<br />
Popularity breeds contempt and this man obviously had an enemy who used this firearm to dispose of him.<br />
Russian Roulette BALDERDASH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Darling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 00:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-514</guid>
		<description>My great grandfather was also in the same regiment and was posted with Tom Darling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My great grandfather was also in the same regiment and was posted with Tom Darling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith MAy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith MAy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I also noticed the incorrect medal ribbon on Tom Darling&#039;s MM.  There was a lot of interesting information about his RAOC service which wasn&#039;t brought out in the programme.  Still some questions left but a better than average series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also noticed the incorrect medal ribbon on Tom Darling&#8217;s MM.  There was a lot of interesting information about his RAOC service which wasn&#8217;t brought out in the programme.  Still some questions left but a better than average series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-511</guid>
		<description>A really shaky start to the series for the first couple of episodes can thankfully be forgiven with a powerful end after a good run of interesting programmes throughout the rest of the run. To me, family history will always be about how it can affect our own identity - to know where you are going you need to know where you have been. Alan Cumming will undoubtedly have been shocked and thrilled, horrified and proud in equal measures by what he found out, and he will undoubtedly not be the man he started off as before his journey. But despite the shocks, I get the feeling he would not have had it any other way, because the truth (as much as could be established) was finally out. A great end to the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really shaky start to the series for the first couple of episodes can thankfully be forgiven with a powerful end after a good run of interesting programmes throughout the rest of the run. To me, family history will always be about how it can affect our own identity &#8211; to know where you are going you need to know where you have been. Alan Cumming will undoubtedly have been shocked and thrilled, horrified and proud in equal measures by what he found out, and he will undoubtedly not be the man he started off as before his journey. But despite the shocks, I get the feeling he would not have had it any other way, because the truth (as much as could be established) was finally out. A great end to the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Darren Lack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Darren Lack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-510</guid>
		<description>I enjoy military history , and am always interested in bravery awards . I was a bit dissapointed , then , that none of the experts noticed that Alan&#039;s grandfathers MM had the War Medal ribbon and not the MM ribbon .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy military history , and am always interested in bravery awards . I was a bit dissapointed , then , that none of the experts noticed that Alan&#8217;s grandfathers MM had the War Medal ribbon and not the MM ribbon .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bromaelor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>bromaelor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-509</guid>
		<description>People watch WDYTYA because they are interested in genealogy. But in the latest series we seem to have most of the research work hidden from us? Perhaps someone in the production team, with a degree in Media Studies from the University of Easy Access, thinks that we don&#039;t need to know about all of that boring stuff? I don&#039;t want a travelogue, let&#039;s get back to genealogy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People watch WDYTYA because they are interested in genealogy. But in the latest series we seem to have most of the research work hidden from us? Perhaps someone in the production team, with a degree in Media Studies from the University of Easy Access, thinks that we don&#8217;t need to know about all of that boring stuff? I don&#8217;t want a travelogue, let&#8217;s get back to genealogy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Stevens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-508</guid>
		<description>PS. I, too, am ex-RAOC, which is why the records just leaped out of the screen to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. I, too, am ex-RAOC, which is why the records just leaped out of the screen to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Stevens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-507</guid>
		<description>I, too, had some worries about the proximity of the muzzle, but I have an even greater concern, and that is the fact that the programme failed to mention that Alan&#039;s grandfather was commissioned into the Royal Army Ordnance Corps, (RAOC). 

The stop/start facility on the Skybox recording is of immense value, as I found out.

He showed his Grandfather&#039;s &#039;Officer&#039;s&#039; Service Record, the small red booklet. His Officer&#039;s service number was 357383. (This was his new service number having forfeited his original service number 2928278, upon commission, which he&#039;d had since originally enlisting).

Great mention was made of the record of injuries, but the expert didn&#039;t seem to notice that the document was now in the name of an officer rather than a Lance Corporal despatch rider.
The evidence was all before him. The large record sheets referred to his Cameron Highlander service, and then in 1946 listed in great detail his RAOC service beginning in India, where it seems he received his commission. 

His initial posting on sheet three states that he joined the Central Ordnance Depot, (COD), in Delhi. Then he was posted to the UK and joined COD Chilwell, moving through various of that unit&#039;s companies: 6 Chilwell MT Group, then 12, back to 10 and finally back to 12. 
From there he was posted to British Army of the Rhine, (BAOR) to serve in Armoured Vehicle support units, Ordnance Field Parks, (OFP&#039;s), etc. All were listed.

He eventually returned from BAOR to the UK and entered Queen Alexander&#039;s Military Hospital in Aldershot. I couldn&#039;t spot whether as a patient or as a member of the support staff. After that he was demobbed via RAOC Feltham in Middlesex.

His RAOC commission is probably why he was able to enlist in the Malay Police Force as the equivalent to a Lieutenant, rather than make a serious promotional leap to that rank from Lance Corporal.

If all of this was left out for editorial reasons, so be it. But I would like Alan to be even more proud of his Grandfather by knowing that he managed to rise to officer rank within the British Army.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, had some worries about the proximity of the muzzle, but I have an even greater concern, and that is the fact that the programme failed to mention that Alan&#8217;s grandfather was commissioned into the Royal Army Ordnance Corps, (RAOC). </p>
<p>The stop/start facility on the Skybox recording is of immense value, as I found out.</p>
<p>He showed his Grandfather&#8217;s &#8216;Officer&#8217;s&#8217; Service Record, the small red booklet. His Officer&#8217;s service number was 357383. (This was his new service number having forfeited his original service number 2928278, upon commission, which he&#8217;d had since originally enlisting).</p>
<p>Great mention was made of the record of injuries, but the expert didn&#8217;t seem to notice that the document was now in the name of an officer rather than a Lance Corporal despatch rider.<br />
The evidence was all before him. The large record sheets referred to his Cameron Highlander service, and then in 1946 listed in great detail his RAOC service beginning in India, where it seems he received his commission. </p>
<p>His initial posting on sheet three states that he joined the Central Ordnance Depot, (COD), in Delhi. Then he was posted to the UK and joined COD Chilwell, moving through various of that unit&#8217;s companies: 6 Chilwell MT Group, then 12, back to 10 and finally back to 12.<br />
From there he was posted to British Army of the Rhine, (BAOR) to serve in Armoured Vehicle support units, Ordnance Field Parks, (OFP&#8217;s), etc. All were listed.</p>
<p>He eventually returned from BAOR to the UK and entered Queen Alexander&#8217;s Military Hospital in Aldershot. I couldn&#8217;t spot whether as a patient or as a member of the support staff. After that he was demobbed via RAOC Feltham in Middlesex.</p>
<p>His RAOC commission is probably why he was able to enlist in the Malay Police Force as the equivalent to a Lieutenant, rather than make a serious promotional leap to that rank from Lance Corporal.</p>
<p>If all of this was left out for editorial reasons, so be it. But I would like Alan to be even more proud of his Grandfather by knowing that he managed to rise to officer rank within the British Army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Perry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/09/14/who-do-you-think-you-are-alan-cumming/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=1080#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I have some concern that the Russian roulette story was not the truth.
The pathologist&#039;s report said that the entry wound showed no powder burns; this indicates that the muzzle of the weapon was not in contact with the skin and must have been some distance away.  The report also said that the entry would was 3 inches behind the ear; this would be towards the back of Tom Darling&#039;s head.  The Webley Mk IV .38&quot; revolver weighs 2.5 lbs and is 10.25&quot; long.  I cannot see how anyone could hold such a weapon at the back of his head with the muzzle sufficiently distant from contact with his scalp so as to avoid powder burns or bruising.
It is such a pity that no comment was made about any efforts by the programme makers to trace and interview the other people who were actually present at the time of the shooting; the summary report compliled by a third party was unconvincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some concern that the Russian roulette story was not the truth.<br />
The pathologist&#8217;s report said that the entry wound showed no powder burns; this indicates that the muzzle of the weapon was not in contact with the skin and must have been some distance away.  The report also said that the entry would was 3 inches behind the ear; this would be towards the back of Tom Darling&#8217;s head.  The Webley Mk IV .38&#8243; revolver weighs 2.5 lbs and is 10.25&#8243; long.  I cannot see how anyone could hold such a weapon at the back of his head with the muzzle sufficiently distant from contact with his scalp so as to avoid powder burns or bruising.<br />
It is such a pity that no comment was made about any efforts by the programme makers to trace and interview the other people who were actually present at the time of the shooting; the summary report compliled by a third party was unconvincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
