<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New at Ancestry&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-340</guid>
		<description>In response to # 13, Larry’s “Should there be a note on a death record of what became of the deceased?”

I can’t see how that is possible. In UK, the  GRO indexes only give the details passed to the ONS, to enable you to order the death certificate, and the Parish burial records are transcribed as they are seen. Admittedly there could be some transcription errors. If the information isn’t given on them, then it is up to us to make further enquires with the Church, or Local council’s cemetery/cremation records. The alternative would be to add a section where additional information (unrelated to the transcription) can be added by users, in the hope that other researchers have found the information from the suggested sources. 

My beef is that Baptism data base of records assume that the date of baptism is the date of birth…NOT! Unless one is vigilant and have looked at the image before attaching, one can end up with an incorrect dob. 

This is probably the wrong place to state the above, but at least it has been aired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to # 13, Larry’s “Should there be a note on a death record of what became of the deceased?”</p>
<p>I can’t see how that is possible. In UK, the  GRO indexes only give the details passed to the ONS, to enable you to order the death certificate, and the Parish burial records are transcribed as they are seen. Admittedly there could be some transcription errors. If the information isn’t given on them, then it is up to us to make further enquires with the Church, or Local council’s cemetery/cremation records. The alternative would be to add a section where additional information (unrelated to the transcription) can be added by users, in the hope that other researchers have found the information from the suggested sources. </p>
<p>My beef is that Baptism data base of records assume that the date of baptism is the date of birth…NOT! Unless one is vigilant and have looked at the image before attaching, one can end up with an incorrect dob. </p>
<p>This is probably the wrong place to state the above, but at least it has been aired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Else Churchill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Else Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Congrats on new job Russell. Poachers and Gamekeepers come to mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on new job Russell. Poachers and Gamekeepers come to mind <img src='http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheridan Whitehead-Friedman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheridan Whitehead-Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Russell! Hope you have many happy hours &quot;managing copy&quot;! (And looking forward to hearing about all the up-coming records - greatly anticipated!)
All the best,
Sheri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Russell! Hope you have many happy hours &#8220;managing copy&#8221;! (And looking forward to hearing about all the up-coming records &#8211; greatly anticipated!)<br />
All the best,<br />
Sheri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinda Curwen-Reed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinda Curwen-Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your new post;  I hope things go well and that you enjoy life at Ancestry!

Belinda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your new post;  I hope things go well and that you enjoy life at Ancestry!</p>
<p>Belinda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Sorry. My last post should read &#039;quick&#039;, silly me!!!
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. My last post should read &#8216;quick&#8217;, silly me!!!<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Just a qick note to congratulate you on your position at Ancestry.
I hope all goes well for you.

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a qick note to congratulate you on your position at Ancestry.<br />
I hope all goes well for you.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Congratulations....

How about a price reduction on the subscription rates to celebrate.  Many are finding the costs are too high and can&#039;t continue their memberships</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations&#8230;.</p>
<p>How about a price reduction on the subscription rates to celebrate.  Many are finding the costs are too high and can&#8217;t continue their memberships</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Etchells</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Etchells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Russell, I hope all goes well with you at Ancestry.
Cheers
Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Russell, I hope all goes well with you at Ancestry.<br />
Cheers<br />
Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Boyd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Hi Russell. Should there be a note on a death record of what became of the deceased? Its so f&#039;n hard, pardon my french, to track where dead people ended up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russell. Should there be a note on a death record of what became of the deceased? Its so f&#8217;n hard, pardon my french, to track where dead people ended up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/06/18/new-at-ancestry/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=751#comment-321</guid>
		<description>With answer to Susan Silcox - With a few exceptions census returns for 1801,1811,1821 and 1831 no longer exist.  Also the Census for 1931 was destroyed during WW2 but in September 1939 a WW2 National Register was compiled.

I agree with bromaelar and would appreciate the census dates to be automatically added.

I would also appreciate a description box to appear when you attach a birth, marriage or death so you can add the register detail at the same time without having to go back once it has been saved.  Finally when you find a Baptism, Military record etc it would be good to be able to attach it to the proper heading and not under residence as it defaults to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With answer to Susan Silcox &#8211; With a few exceptions census returns for 1801,1811,1821 and 1831 no longer exist.  Also the Census for 1931 was destroyed during WW2 but in September 1939 a WW2 National Register was compiled.</p>
<p>I agree with bromaelar and would appreciate the census dates to be automatically added.</p>
<p>I would also appreciate a description box to appear when you attach a birth, marriage or death so you can add the register detail at the same time without having to go back once it has been saved.  Finally when you find a Baptism, Military record etc it would be good to be able to attach it to the proper heading and not under residence as it defaults to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
