<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious Freedom, Anti-slavery &amp; Workers&#8217; Rights &#8211; London Non Conformist Registers Now Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/</link>
	<description>The official Ancestry.co.uk blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Keck from Ancestry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Keck from Ancestry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-304</guid>
		<description>We are aware of some concerns regarding county names in the London records and we&#039;re working to address those as quickly as possible.  Thanks for your patience and understanding.

As for baptism dates and Banns dates, we realize that these dates are not interchangeable for birth dates or marriage dates and that Bann dates do not even indicate for certain that a marriage took place.  We do indicate when the birth date is an estimation and we have made the Bann date searchable through the same tool as marriage dates merely for simplicities sake.

As with all new features, or changes, things are a work in progress and we appreciate hearing your feedback and concerns so we can work to make the site better and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are aware of some concerns regarding county names in the London records and we&#8217;re working to address those as quickly as possible.  Thanks for your patience and understanding.</p>
<p>As for baptism dates and Banns dates, we realize that these dates are not interchangeable for birth dates or marriage dates and that Bann dates do not even indicate for certain that a marriage took place.  We do indicate when the birth date is an estimation and we have made the Bann date searchable through the same tool as marriage dates merely for simplicities sake.</p>
<p>As with all new features, or changes, things are a work in progress and we appreciate hearing your feedback and concerns so we can work to make the site better and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-294</guid>
		<description>I’d certainly concur with Robert’s point about the indexing of LMA parish records. 

Why on earth didn’t the Tech guys think this one through when they built the transcribing form???? Not all baptisms give the date of birth, and not all births were followed in short order by a baptism! 

The novice researcher wouldn’t think to trawl through all the available records which matched parent name criteria, especially if the ** apparent ** dob is a number of years after the actual dob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d certainly concur with Robert’s point about the indexing of LMA parish records. </p>
<p>Why on earth didn’t the Tech guys think this one through when they built the transcribing form???? Not all baptisms give the date of birth, and not all births were followed in short order by a baptism! </p>
<p>The novice researcher wouldn’t think to trawl through all the available records which matched parent name criteria, especially if the ** apparent ** dob is a number of years after the actual dob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-293</guid>
		<description>LMA records have now been available for more than a year and in general I&#039;ve found them very useful. However, would it not be a good idea to put right the buggy bits before launching lots more records? For example many of the Boroughs south of the river Thames say they were in Middlesex when they were actually in Surrey (Lambeth is a good example).

Other problems exist with London Births, Baptisms, Banns, Marriages, Death and Burials records where Baptism dates are treated as Birth dates, Banns dates are treated as Marriage dates and Burial dates are treated as Death dates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMA records have now been available for more than a year and in general I&#8217;ve found them very useful. However, would it not be a good idea to put right the buggy bits before launching lots more records? For example many of the Boroughs south of the river Thames say they were in Middlesex when they were actually in Surrey (Lambeth is a good example).</p>
<p>Other problems exist with London Births, Baptisms, Banns, Marriages, Death and Burials records where Baptism dates are treated as Birth dates, Banns dates are treated as Marriage dates and Burial dates are treated as Death dates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akeck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Akeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Hi Hadyn,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your question, we wanted to make sure we had accurate information before we posted.  At this time we don&#039;t have any concrete plans to add Welsh non-conformist records but we do hope to be able to bring our customers more non-conformist records from all over the UK moving forward.  Thanks for your question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hadyn,</p>
<p>Sorry for the delay in responding to your question, we wanted to make sure we had accurate information before we posted.  At this time we don&#8217;t have any concrete plans to add Welsh non-conformist records but we do hope to be able to bring our customers more non-conformist records from all over the UK moving forward.  Thanks for your question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelbartley46</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelbartley46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I think sometimes Ancestery thinks London is the only city in England.

What about us provincials ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think sometimes Ancestery thinks London is the only city in England.</p>
<p>What about us provincials ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bromaelor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>bromaelor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Yes Haydn. I&#039;m with you on that one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Haydn. I&#8217;m with you on that one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haydn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Haydn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Hi Annabel

Will you be adding any Welsh Parish or Non Conformist Registers any time in the near future. I am especially interseted in North Wales.

Thanks

Haydn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Annabel</p>
<p>Will you be adding any Welsh Parish or Non Conformist Registers any time in the near future. I am especially interseted in North Wales.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Haydn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annabel Bernhardt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Annabel Bernhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Hi Sharron - the Non Conformist Registers were temporarily down but are back up and running now so please do have another try. Your Premium membership will give you full access to the collection. Happy searching! Annabel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sharron &#8211; the Non Conformist Registers were temporarily down but are back up and running now so please do have another try. Your Premium membership will give you full access to the collection. Happy searching! Annabel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/2010/05/26/religious-freedom-anti-slavery-workers-rights-london-non-conformist-registers-now-online/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 11:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/uk/?p=710#comment-276</guid>
		<description>None of the links to the non-conformist records seem to work and they don&#039;t appear to be in the Card Catalogue.......... I am just being bounced to a message that says that Ancestry does not have enough information to do a search.  I have Premium membership already so I didn&#039;t need to upgrade my membership to access them (as instructed in your ads).
Is it just me, or is it a general problem?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of the links to the non-conformist records seem to work and they don&#8217;t appear to be in the Card Catalogue&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. I am just being bounced to a message that says that Ancestry does not have enough information to do a search.  I have Premium membership already so I didn&#8217;t need to upgrade my membership to access them (as instructed in your ads).<br />
Is it just me, or is it a general problem?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
