Tips from the Pros: Date Estimates: More Than a Good Guess, from Sherry Irvine, CG, FSA (Scot)

Most online database websites provide a field for selecting the date range of a search, or the age range of an individual in a particular record. An age range is, in fact, a date range because you are estimating the period of years in which a birth took place. Regardless of the nature of the date estimate or the breadth of years you choose to search, careful analysis should go into the choice.

When searching for an individual take into account what date information you have and where it came from. Can it be considered accurate? What did a record state? Some individuals regularly lied about age, not necessarily with any consistency as to the error. Some records did not require an accurate age, perhaps just an indication the individual was over the age of twenty-one.

A successful search could also depend upon the date when the record was made. This is true of wills. The date of probate is more significant and may have been years after the date of death.

If you choose the Advanced Search at Ancestry, or when a search form includes the date range option, you select a year and then select a number of years either side of it:

+/- 0 (meaning exact),
+/- 1 (a three-year span),
+/- 2 (a five-year span),
+/- 5 (an eleven-year span).
+/- 10 (a twenty-one-year span), and
+/- 20 years (a forty-one-year span).

Keep in mind that the year you are estimating from may not be the best middle year for the plus and minus range for the search tool. Sometimes I estimate a birth as after a certain date (e.g., after 1847). In this case, I would not set 1847 as the middle year, but choose 1851, plus or minus five to cover the years 1846 to 1856. Some websites ask for a start year and an end year to set your search, which saves some mental arithmetic.

Keep some other factors in mind as you set date ranges. Is the name common or rare? Setting a date range is one way to reduce the number of results, but keep track of what you do in case you must work step-by-step–perhaps ten years at a time–through a long period. Also, when searching a single record, make sure you know its starting date. For example, with civil birth records in England and Wales, the start date is 1 July 1837, and your range of years should include dates that fall after that.

Finally, your estimate may sometimes depend upon historical knowledge. The year a family migrated to North America is a good example. Check into the history of the country of origin, and the particular place. Discovering a year of political upheaval or some years of great hardship could help focus a search.

Click here for a printer friendly version of this article.

Your Quick Tips, 05 February 2007

Search Census by Place of Birth
When you hit a brick wall searching for immigrant ancestors, try searching census records by place of birth alone after entering the state and city where they lived. This is most effective where the population count among the immigrant community in the city is expected to be relatively low. All the misspelled surnames suddenly appear, and among these you may recognize your ancestor based on similar spellings, age, familiar given names, etc. I found a great-grandfather, Paul Arata, a native of Italy listed as Paulo Larate in the 1860 census for Philadelphia using this method. He was one of 302 listings, easily scanned in a few minutes. I would never have found him otherwise.

A word of caution–in the nineteenth century, despite the unification of Italy in 1861 and the unification of Germany in 1871, some immigrants reported their place of birth by former kingdoms, duchies, cities, etc. For example, in the 1880 census of Philadelphia, more than 26,000 people reported their place of birth as Germany, but 3,152 reported Bavaria; 4,459 reported Prussia; and 4,427 reported Baden. Since twenty-six independent German states unified to become the German Empire it is possible that any one of these could have been reported as a place of birth. Also, since enumerators were inconsistent in spelling or abbreviating the names of the reported countries, you will find Italians listed under “Italy,” “Ita,” and “It” as well as Genoa, Florence, Rome, etc. I recommend including all reasonable possibilities in your search argument. It is a powerful tool and brings surprising results.

Louis Arata Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

The Year Was 1866

Freeman Homestead National Monument, Beatrice, NEThe year was 1866 and the United States was in a period of Reconstruction following the Civil War. In April, the Civil Rights Act was passed despite a veto by President Andrew Johnson. The act declared that all non-foreign born persons were citizens and as such, could “without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property,  and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property.” 

Unfortunately it doesn’t go far enough in protecting African Americans, and in Memphis racial violence breaks out in May leaving forty-six African American and two white citizens dead, many more injured, and black schools, churches and homes burned. 

While fighting in the U.S. had ended, across the ocean, trouble was brewing and in June Austria and some German states declared war on Prussia. Following an alliance signed with Prussia, Italy joins the war days later, with an eye towards gaining the territory of Venetia and completing Italian unification. The war ended seven weeks after it began with Prussian victory; Italy did get Venetia eventually through the Treaty of Vienna. Continue reading

Photo Corner

Julia Dooley, born in 1890 in Florence, WisconsinContributed by Bonnie Hartmann, California
Both of these are of my great-aunt Julia Dooley. She was born in 1890 in Florence, Wisconsin, where her father was a town councilman. She later married John Karnold of Detroit, Michigan. She was the first born of four children and obviously pampered!

Click on the image to enlarge it.

Nathan, Yetta (age 17), and Sarah Malkin Peckerov. Contributed by Elaine Liddell
Here is a picture of my great-grandfather, my grandmother, and my great-grandmother– Nathan, Yetta (age 17), and Sarah Malkin Peckerov.

Feeling Bookish, by Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak

generations of somerset place.jpgWinter is a great time to read, isn’t it? Not that there’s any time of year that’s not appropriate for reading, but there’s just something about curling up with a good book when it’s fierce outside that makes it even more of a treat. So I took advantage of the season and did a little curling up recently to read two of the books that were recommended by 24/7 Family History Circle readers.

Somerset Homecoming: Recovering a Lost Heritage
The first book I read was first published back in 1989, although a newer version from 2000 is also available. Written by Dorothy Spruill Redford (with Michael D’Orso), Generations of Somerset Place: From Slavery to Freedom is definitely going on my list of genealogical must-reads. Lin Mann was the one who initially suggested it:

“Every person can relate to Mrs. Redford, an untrained genealogist or historian who simply started asking everyday questions. That created more questions. That demanded research and a stubborn search for the reality behind family lore. That created pride in knowing; discovering people from scraps of information, her people. Mrs. Redford took it a step further than most of us and shared her knowledge with her now-extended family and the world. Although hers is an African American story, it should inspire every person to explore his/her ethnic roots.” Continue reading

Ancestry.com Users Create More Than 1 Million Family Trees Online in Past Six Months

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE      

More than 150 Million Names Added and 400,000 Photos Uploaded as Ancestry.com Revolutionizes Online Tree-Building Collaboration

PROVO, UTAH – February 1, 2007 – Ancestry.com, the world’s largest online family history resource, today announced that more than 1 million online family trees have been created since the site’s new tree-building and sharing features launched in late July 2006. In building family trees, users have added an estimated 150 million names, uploaded 400,000 photos and attached 10 million family history documents directly from Ancestry.com’s 23,000 historical records collections.

Built with family collaboration in mind, the tree-building tools on Ancestry.com allow family members to work together on their family trees, whether living in the same house or on the other side of the world. Families can add their ancestors’ names, photos, life stories and much more to a shared family tree – all for free.

In addition to the impressive number of family trees which have been created, users are also adding names, photos and documents at impressive rates, as a result of the site’s easy-to-use tools and an increasing worldwide interest in family history. Users in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada and Australia are creating and sharing their family trees with Ancestry.com’s advanced tree-building and collaborative tools. Continue reading