<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ancestry.com Blog &#187; Gary Gibb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/author/ggibb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How many billions of records are on Ancestry.com?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/30/how-many-billions-of-records-are-on-ancestrycom/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/30/how-many-billions-of-records-are-on-ancestrycom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The size of Ancestry.com’s record collection is a fascinating topic. As of June 2009, subscribers to Ancestry.com and our international sites can search the historical censuses for the U.S., UK and Canada, U.S. and international vital records, amazing collections of military and immigration records, and many others, not to mention the 10 million family trees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">The size of Ancestry.com’s record collection is a fascinating topic. As of June 2009, subscribers to Ancestry.com and our international sites can search the historical censuses for the U.S., UK and Canada, U.S. and international vital records, amazing collections of military and immigration records, and many others, not to mention the 10 million family trees added to our site by members in the last three years with over one billion profiles (names) and 20 million user-submitted photos and stories. This much is certain: Ancestry.com is far and away the largest collection of family history records online.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Defining and counting records on Ancestry.com </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">The concept of ‘counting’ records sounds relatively simple until you get deep into the details. How is a record defined? Is it a mention of a person? A household? A page? If a birth record has the person, parents, doctor and witness, how many records is that? And what of records where we don’t know for certain how many people are referenced, such as newspapers or city directories?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">For our ‘fielded’ or indexed collections &#8211; structured data such as censuses and passenger lists &#8211; a record count is defined as the information about each specific person included. For example, one WWI Draft Registration Card is counted as one record. Similarly, each line on a census page is also counted as one record as typically it to will contain information about a specific individual. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">For our ‘unfielded‘ collections such as newspapers and family histories, there is no underlying structure to define a field and so until now pages have been sampled then an average applied to determine an estimated name count. For example, our 42.5 million (countable) newspaper pages were multiplied by 60 names per page to achieve an estimated total name count.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Traditionally, we have counted our total number of records by combining the number of records for each person contained in our fielded collections and the estimated number of names in our unfielded collections.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">However, as our company and collections have grown so significantly in recent years, we have decided to apply a new and highly conservative counting methodology that better reflects our differing data structures. Going forward, all unfielded <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">pages</em> will now be counted as one record &#8211; no name estimates will be included in our total record counts. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">So what does this mean?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Based on this new methodology we have over 4 billion records. Previously, we referred to an estimated 8 billion names listed with in our record collections. This is a change to our counting methodology only &#8211; no records have been removed. Ancestry.com members will continue to have access to all the great records they had previously.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">With new records launching every week, these numbers are always increasing. More importantly, no matter how we count them, our goal is to continue to bring millions of valuable records to our members like we’ve been doing for more than a decade.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/30/how-many-billions-of-records-are-on-ancestrycom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Census Complete 1851-1916</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/10/canadian-census-complete-1851-1916/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/10/canadian-census-complete-1851-1916/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just released the final 3 census years to complete the Canadian Census collection from 1851 to 1916.  The Canadian Census Collection represents the first time ever that the 1851/2, 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1906, 1911 and 1916 censuses will be fully searchable online. 
For those of us that have some Canadian roots this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just released the final 3 census years to complete the Canadian Census collection from 1851 to 1916.  The Canadian Census Collection represents the first time ever that the 1851/2, 1861, 1871, 1881, 1891, 1901, 1906, 1911 and 1916 censuses will be fully searchable online. </p>
<p>For those of us that have some Canadian roots this is a great day. I have already found many records about my ancestors in these collections.  The complete collection is useful for helping to track an ancestor&#8217;s life and understanding the family. We have had the complete national census collections for the US and the UK for years now but this is the first time we have it for Canada. We were able to partner with the Library and Archives in Canada and with FamilySearch to make this happen in a very aggressive timeframe from the public release of these records by the Canadian government.</p>
<p>We hope you find a lot of success in this collection and we would love to hear from you about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/06/10/canadian-census-complete-1851-1916/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Way to Learn About New Content</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/14/good-way-to-learn-about-new-content/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/14/good-way-to-learn-about-new-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great way to keep up-to-date with the latest content we&#8217;ve released on Ancestry.com is to subscribe to our monthly newsletter, the Ancestry Monthly Update. This email newsletter lists all the latest U.S. and international records launched on the site in the previous month, along with some of the larger collections scheduled to be released in the coming month(s). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great way to keep up-to-date with the latest content we&#8217;ve released on Ancestry.com is to subscribe to our monthly newsletter, the <em>Ancestry Monthly Update</em>. This email newsletter lists all the latest U.S. and international records launched on the site in the previous month, along with some of the larger collections scheduled to be released in the coming month(s). Besides that, you&#8217;ll get helpful articles and tips for your research, the latest company news, and heartwarming success stories from users like you. It’s a great way to keep up on the latest at Ancestry.com and feel connected to the community.</p>
<p>To see a sample image of the newsletter, go here: <a href="http://landing.ancestry.com/onlinenewsletter/?issue=AMU_feb2009">http://landing.ancestry.com/onlinenewsletter/?issue=AMU_feb2009</a></p>
<p>To start receiving your free copy of the <em>Ancestry Monthly Update</em>, go here and make sure <em>Ancestry.com Monthly Update</em> is checked: <a href="https://secure.ancestry.com/myaccount/communications.aspx">https://secure.ancestry.com/myaccount/communications.aspx</a></p>
<p>This newsletter is a great resource that not everyone has. I would love to hear your thoughts about the <em>Ancestry Monthly Update</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/14/good-way-to-learn-about-new-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New German Records</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/08/new-german-records/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/08/new-german-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[German records have long been requested by our members. It is estimated that almost 1 in 6 Americans have German heritage.  These records are very hard to acquire. Since they are hard to acquire we are particularly excited about a new very large collection featuring some more recent records from Germany.
We just released today the German Phone Directories 1915-1981. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">German records have long been requested by our members. It is estimated that almost 1 in 6 Americans have German heritage.  These records are very hard to acquire. Since they are hard to acquire we are particularly excited about a new very large collection featuring some more recent records from Germany.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">We just released today the German Phone Directories 1915-1981. This is a unique colleciotn of books that contains over 35 million people that lived in the major cities in Germany in the 20th century. This is the first time these records have been available online.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB">As phone books provide an annual account of an individual’s location, they are a hugely valuable resource for tracing people’s movements around Germany before or after the two World Wars and the Great Depression, during the tyranny of the Third Reich and following Germany’s division by the Berlin Wall.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB">In addition to everyday Germans, the phone books contain names of some of the country’s most famous &#8211; and infamous &#8211; citizens, including: </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span>Albert Einstein – The Nobel Prize winning physicist is listed in the 1930 Berlin directory as Prof. Dr. Univ. His phone number was 2807 (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span>Marlene Dietrich – The legendary actress who starred in Shanghai Express is listed in the 1930 Berlin directory living at 54 Kaiserallee. Her telephone number was H1 Pfalzburg 2142 (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span>Eva Braun – Mistress and later wife of Adolf Hitler, Ms. Braun is listed in the 1937 Munich directory living at Wasserburger Strasse. Her telephone number was 480844 (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB">Rudolf Hess – Hitler’s private secretary and later Deputy Fuhrer is listed in the 1938 Hamburg directory, which describes his title as ‘SS-Untersturmfuhrer’ (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-indent: 0.5in; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB">Dr Karl Braun – The physicist, inventor and Nobel Prize winner travelled to the US in 1914 but was forbidden to return when America entered the First World War. He is listed in the 1915 Berlin director, with no further entries after that year. Braun died in Brooklyn, New York in 1918 (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span>Otto Lagerfeld – The father of the famous fashion designer Karl appears in the 1933 Hamburg directory living in the wealthy Elbchaussee. His telephone number was 462349.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It is believed that Karl Lagerfeld still owns an exclusive villa on that street (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;">                </span>Kaiser Friedrich Wilhelm Viktor Albert von Preußen – Germany’s last Kaiser is listed in the 1915 Berlin directory residing in the Royal Castle Berlin. His phone number was 482 (original image available)</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 14.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB">We hope you enjoy these German records.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 14.25pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/08/new-german-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge new content addition for more recent years</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/03/18/huge-new-content-addition-for-more-recent-years/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/03/18/huge-new-content-addition-for-more-recent-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are launching huge new content additions over the next few weeks.  We are excited because it helps provide records from 1935 to today.  We have great census and vital records from 1930 and before but more recent records are difficult to acquire.  These new records are being provided in 4 major releases.
First, we launched a 1940 census substitute. This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are launching huge new content additions over the next few weeks.  We are excited because it helps provide records from 1935 to today.  We have great census and vital records from 1930 and before but more recent records are difficult to acquire.  These new records are being provided in 4 major releases.</p>
<p>First, we launched a 1940 census substitute. This is a project that we have been working on for years.  Since we can&#8217;t get the real 1940 census until 2012 we have pulled together a huge collection of city directories from about 1935 to 1945.  This collection has over 100 million names and covers most of the US. </p>
<p>Second, we will launch in the next week (or two) the first ever collection of U.S. Public Records (USPRI) database with more than 525 million names, addresses, ages, and possible family relationships of people who lived in the United States between roughly 1950 and 1990.  This will be an invaluable tool in piecing together family stories and histories.  This new addition will replace the current USPRI database on Ancestry which is mainly profiles of living people. This database is built from a variety of city directories and other public records.</p>
<p>Third, we launched search results and links to living people records on MyLife.com.  We are excited about this partnership because MyLife has a much better collection of records about living people and continues to update this collection.  MyLife.com includes current public information and more than 700 million profiles of living people. They are much better equipped to offer these services than we are. If you want to find a living cousin or second cousin or other living relative we believe these links to MyLife will be the best service to help you contact your family.</p>
<p>Finally, we launched a new obituary collection.  We have had several very popular obituary collections for several years.  We have now upgraded our collection that we extract from obituaries posted in newspapers around the world with much better fielding and from more papers.  This should help you more easily identify the right obituary and find family relationships.</p>
<p>In the coming months look for additional signficant improvements to all the US Federal Census from 1800 to 1890. We will also continue to release millions of vital records every month.  We are also excited about the upcoming large addition to our newspaper and military collections over the next few months.</p>
<p>We hope these additions help you discover more of your family story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/03/18/huge-new-content-addition-for-more-recent-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>167</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why such little interest in Central and South American records?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/23/why-such-little-interest-in-central-and-south-american-records/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/23/why-such-little-interest-in-central-and-south-american-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/23/why-such-little-interest-in-central-and-south-american-records/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have run many surveys regarding content interest around the world.  We consistently see relatively small interest in content from Central and South America.  We have a huge number of people that have ancestors from these areas both in the United States and in those countries. We have some opportunities to get many more records from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have run many surveys regarding content interest around the world.  We consistently see relatively small interest in content from Central and South America.  We have a huge number of people that have ancestors from these areas both in the United States and in those countries. We have some opportunities to get many more records from these areas but the interest from current customers seems very low.  I would love to understand more about this discrepancy &#8211; meaning a high number of people but very low interest.</p>
<p>Is it that we have had so few records from Central and South America that people that come from those places do not visit Ancestry?</p>
<p>Is it that they just have lower interest in Genealogy?</p>
<p>I actually spent a few years living in Argentina and learned to really appreciate the people. I felt like they were generally very interested in their family history but I didn&#8217;t really focus on this. I am still a little surprised to not see more interest in these records. If you have any insights into this we would appreciate your feedback.</p>
<p>Thanks for working with us.</p>
<p>GG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/23/why-such-little-interest-in-central-and-south-american-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge Newspaper Addition Coming&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/05/huge-newspaper-addition-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/05/huge-newspaper-addition-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/05/huge-newspaper-addition-coming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are excited to release a very large and very significant addition to our newspaper collection. It will double the size of our current collection. We are also improving our search experience with newspapers to help you find the information you are looking for.
Newspapers can be an amazing gem of a resource. In addition to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are excited to release a very large and very significant addition to our newspaper collection. It will double the size of our current collection. We are also improving our search experience with newspapers to help you find the information you are looking for.</p>
<p>Newspapers can be an amazing gem of a resource. In addition to obituaries, birth and marriage announcements the papers frequently have interesting stories about military service, financial matters and other personal stories.</p>
<p>Another side of interest is how the world events affected the towns where your ancestors lived. </p>
<p> Newspapers have not been highly used on Ancestry to date.  We would love to hear from you about this new collection of newspapers. Is it of interest to you? Do you want more? Do you want a specific time or place? Do you like a diversity of records like this or would you rather just have us focus most of our efforts on vitals?</p>
<p>We appreciate your feedback.</p>
<p>GG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/05/huge-newspaper-addition-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Passports Coming Soon&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/11/16/passports-coming-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/11/16/passports-coming-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/11/16/passports-coming-soon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a fun collection coming very soon to Ancestry.com. It is a US passport collection with millions of names from the years 1796 to 1925.  Passports became more popular in the late 1840s. In 1914, American citizens were permitted to travel abroad without passports.  If your ancestors were travelers this will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/passport.jpg" title="Old Passport Record"><img src="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/passport.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Old Passport Record" align="right" /></a>We have a fun collection coming very soon to Ancestry.com. It is a US passport collection with millions of names from the years 1796 to 1925.  Passports became more popular in the late 1840s. In 1914, American citizens were permitted to travel abroad without passports.  If your ancestors were travelers this will be a great collection for you. If you find a hit for one of your ancestors you will get a little gold mine of information. Many of these applications include photos. The applications can reveal:</p>
<ul>
<li>Name at Birth</li>
<li>Birth Date</li>
<li>Birth Place</li>
<li>Residence</li>
<li>Naturalization (if foreign-born)</li>
<li>Spouse Name</li>
<li>Occupation</li>
<li>and some of the newer applications include marriage and family information</li>
</ul>
<p>I would love to hear of any success you may have when this collection is released.</p>
<p>GG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/11/16/passports-coming-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Content Survey Results</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/10/27/recently-completed-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/10/27/recently-completed-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gibb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/10/27/recently-completed-survey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just completed a survey of over 1,000 Ancestry customers and learned what we should emphasize for 2008. I would like to get additional individual input, suggestions and comments from others to refine what we do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/subscriber_content_survey.gif" alt="Subscriber Content Survey" /></p>
<p>We just completed a survey of over 10,000 Ancestry.com (mostly US-based) customers and learned what US content we should emphasize for 2008.  I would like to get additional individual input, suggestions and comments from others to refine what we do.  Here are two of the interesting findings:</p>
<p>1) Customers record type priority list was first additional birth, marriage and death records followed by more census, immigration, military, court, trees and newspapers.</p>
<p>2) Customers want to be informed of new interesting content additions by email weekly/monthly (most wanted monthly). I was surprised daily wasn&#8217;t wanted by most.</p>
<p>We have some very exciting new content that is in our content &#8220;pipeline&#8221; right now. I am looking forward to releasing great new offerings with a huge emphasis on vital records, lots of additional state censuses and some very useful and interesting augmentations to the federal census, huge immigration additions, and a very rich military release (similar to our military promotion last May).</p>
<p>I would love to hear what content you want most.</p>
<p>GG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/10/27/recently-completed-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
