<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interactive Image Viewer (Beta)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interactive-image-viewer-beta</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Dansbury</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54533</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Dansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54533</guid>
		<description>All, 

The “View Interactive Image (BETA)&quot; link is now available on all 1930 US Federal Census record pages on Ancestry.com.  If you can&#039;t see the link, you may need to delete your cookies. 

thank you,
Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All, </p>
<p>The “View Interactive Image (BETA)&#8221; link is now available on all 1930 US Federal Census record pages on Ancestry.com.  If you can&#8217;t see the link, you may need to delete your cookies. </p>
<p>thank you,<br />
Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Dansbury</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54532</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Dansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54532</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff, 

Thank you for letting us know.  Can you email me with more details?  Browser, operating system, URL of the page you are trying to save? 

ldansbury at ancestry dot com.

thank you,
Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, </p>
<p>Thank you for letting us know.  Can you email me with more details?  Browser, operating system, URL of the page you are trying to save? </p>
<p>ldansbury at ancestry dot com.</p>
<p>thank you,<br />
Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jahn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54531</guid>
		<description>&quot;Laura Dansbury February 6, 2012 at 5:09 pm
Jeff Jahn, What happened when you tried to save an image?&quot;

Laura i get a HTTP 403 Forbidden message &quot;This website declined to show this webpage&quot; when using the Advanced Image Viewer.  I have to use the Old one to save a image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Laura Dansbury February 6, 2012 at 5:09 pm<br />
Jeff Jahn, What happened when you tried to save an image?&#8221;</p>
<p>Laura i get a HTTP 403 Forbidden message &#8220;This website declined to show this webpage&#8221; when using the Advanced Image Viewer.  I have to use the Old one to save a image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54497</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54497</guid>
		<description>@Mike #9 Works fine for me in FF 10.

@Laura - Looks good! Any better timeframe for 1930 US?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike #9 Works fine for me in FF 10.</p>
<p>@Laura &#8211; Looks good! Any better timeframe for 1930 US?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Fisher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54486</guid>
		<description>I search and find using the link for 1911 census Wales in firefox and get no image loaded but I do using IE , is it a flash item ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I search and find using the link for 1911 census Wales in firefox and get no image loaded but I do using IE , is it a flash item ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Dansbury</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54470</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Dansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54470</guid>
		<description>Jeff Jahn, 
What happened when you tried to save an image?

Andy,
The highlights are available on all the 3 UK censuses below when you click on the beta link from the record page.  You may need to clear your cookies to see the beta link on the record page.   The beta link is also available on a small percent of 1930 US Census records. 

1911 Channel Islands Census
1911 Wales Census
1911 Isle of Man Census</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Jahn,<br />
What happened when you tried to save an image?</p>
<p>Andy,<br />
The highlights are available on all the 3 UK censuses below when you click on the beta link from the record page.  You may need to clear your cookies to see the beta link on the record page.   The beta link is also available on a small percent of 1930 US Census records. </p>
<p>1911 Channel Islands Census<br />
1911 Wales Census<br />
1911 Isle of Man Census</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hatchett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54443</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hatchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54443</guid>
		<description>I also would like to know how to do that highlighting trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also would like to know how to do that highlighting trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie York</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54424</guid>
		<description>from roots tech 2012 Barbara Renick 11 layers of online search. did a &quot;find on Page&quot; where in the search results it showed the township highlighted to make it easier to scroll through on the 1870 census for Jobin vs Tobin
How do I do that I looked through the learning center and could not find it.
Thanks
Bonnie York</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from roots tech 2012 Barbara Renick 11 layers of online search. did a &#8220;find on Page&#8221; where in the search results it showed the township highlighted to make it easier to scroll through on the 1870 census for Jobin vs Tobin<br />
How do I do that I looked through the learning center and could not find it.<br />
Thanks<br />
Bonnie York</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jahn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54417</guid>
		<description>I know the highlight ability seems nice at first glance but frankly isnt all that useful unless you save a image for each household. In my case of the 15 households list on page all maybe related to me. Also while playing with the beta of the view i noticed the save image option wont work for me had to go back to the old enhanced viewer instead of the beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the highlight ability seems nice at first glance but frankly isnt all that useful unless you save a image for each household. In my case of the 15 households list on page all maybe related to me. Also while playing with the beta of the view i noticed the save image option wont work for me had to go back to the old enhanced viewer instead of the beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2012/01/31/interactive-image-viewer-beta/#comment-54412</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6949#comment-54412</guid>
		<description>It looks good, but with the records that, how should I put this, have been cleaned up to look good, and only made them next to impossible to read now, this is not going to help in any way to improve the reading of them.  If those that were cleaned up were put back to orginal it would help alot.  The last two weeks I have been looking at Sweden church records that made me cry, because they were unreadable.  Evey little speckle on a record can deterime many things. Is there any hope of getting those records restored back to how they were?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good, but with the records that, how should I put this, have been cleaned up to look good, and only made them next to impossible to read now, this is not going to help in any way to improve the reading of them.  If those that were cleaned up were put back to orginal it would help alot.  The last two weeks I have been looking at Sweden church records that made me cry, because they were unreadable.  Evey little speckle on a record can deterime many things. Is there any hope of getting those records restored back to how they were?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
