<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take a Free Ride with Immigration Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hatchett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53618</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hatchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53618</guid>
		<description>Sherry Re: #10

If you&#039;ll post a message on the Ancestry Comments Board:

http://boards.ancestry.com/topics.ancestry.ancsite/mb.ashx

Please be as specific as possible- and a screen shot of how you fill out the search form would help- I&#039;ll try to assist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherry Re: #10</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ll post a message on the Ancestry Comments Board:</p>
<p><a href="http://boards.ancestry.com/topics.ancestry.ancsite/mb.ashx" rel="nofollow">http://boards.ancestry.com/topics.ancestry.ancsite/mb.ashx</a></p>
<p>Please be as specific as possible- and a screen shot of how you fill out the search form would help- I&#8217;ll try to assist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Swatling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53614</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Swatling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53614</guid>
		<description>I agree with Martha Sobolow Friedman.  I keep getting a sign-up page also.  I must have misunderstood your ads stating that this is a &quot;free&quot; weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Martha Sobolow Friedman.  I keep getting a sign-up page also.  I must have misunderstood your ads stating that this is a &#8220;free&#8221; weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Sobolow Friedman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53613</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Sobolow Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53613</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that we could find info on people using their names. I can&#039;t find anything about my grandparents or any other family member that came from Europe. I keep getting the page to sign up. I was hoping to get to see how this worked, but it&#039;s useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that we could find info on people using their names. I can&#8217;t find anything about my grandparents or any other family member that came from Europe. I keep getting the page to sign up. I was hoping to get to see how this worked, but it&#8217;s useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BEE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53612</link>
		<dc:creator>BEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53612</guid>
		<description>regarding Sherry&#039;s #10 comment - Another reason to hate &quot;new search&quot; - I&#039;m glad that I&#039;m not just starting out using ancestry.
No matter how much I try to use &quot;new search&quot; - and I do, especially for ship manifests that I can&#039;t find, and I know many &quot;tricks&quot;, I have never found anything on it that I didn&#039;t find much easier using {in my humble opinion} the less complicated &quot;old search&quot; - if I find it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regarding Sherry&#8217;s #10 comment &#8211; Another reason to hate &#8220;new search&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m glad that I&#8217;m not just starting out using ancestry.<br />
No matter how much I try to use &#8220;new search&#8221; &#8211; and I do, especially for ship manifests that I can&#8217;t find, and I know many &#8220;tricks&#8221;, I have never found anything on it that I didn&#8217;t find much easier using {in my humble opinion} the less complicated &#8220;old search&#8221; &#8211; if I find it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Primmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53611</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Primmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53611</guid>
		<description>I have not found the immigration records to be helpful.  Even though I have given quite a bit information about the person I am looking for, I am given about 25,000 names to search.  I hope Ancestry.com will extend our time to search because this will take me MONTHS!

Why does my search give me so many names to search through?

slprimmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not found the immigration records to be helpful.  Even though I have given quite a bit information about the person I am looking for, I am given about 25,000 names to search.  I hope Ancestry.com will extend our time to search because this will take me MONTHS!</p>
<p>Why does my search give me so many names to search through?</p>
<p>slprimmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53607</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53607</guid>
		<description>How does this collection differ from what I already have in my US collection? I&#039;m a bit confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this collection differ from what I already have in my US collection? I&#8217;m a bit confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Spaans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Spaans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53599</guid>
		<description>this was pretty useless. you didn&#039;t even give me a record I already was aware of. Didn&#039;t see any immigration stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was pretty useless. you didn&#8217;t even give me a record I already was aware of. Didn&#8217;t see any immigration stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53598</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 04:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53598</guid>
		<description>FACTS Regarding American born females marrying husbands who were aliens:

After 1907, marriage determined a woman&#039;s nationality status completely. Under the act of March 2, 1907, all women acquired their husband&#039;s nationality upon any marriage occurring after that date. This changed nothing for immigrant women, but U.S.-born citizen women could now lose their citizenship by any marriage to any alien. Most of these women subsequently regained their U.S. citizenship when their husbands naturalized. However, those who married Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, or other men racially ineligible to naturalize forfeited their U.S. citizenship. Similarly, many former U.S. citizen women found themselves married to men who were ineligible to citizenship for some other reason or who simply refused to naturalize. Because the courts held that a husband&#039;s nationality would always determine that of the wife, a married woman could not legally file for naturalization.(6) 


Happily, Congress was at work and on September 22, 1922, passed the Married Women&#039;s Act, also known as the Cable Act. This 1922 law finally gave each woman a nationality of her own. No marriage since that date has granted U.S. citizenship to any alien woman nor taken it from any U.S.-born women who married an alien eligible to naturalization.(11) Under the new law women became eligible to naturalize on (almost) the same terms as men. The only difference concerned those women whose husbands had already naturalized. If her husband was a citizen, the wife did not need to file a declaration of intention. She could initiate naturalization proceedings with a petition alone (one-paper naturalization). A woman whose husband remained an alien had to start at the beginning, with a declaration of intention. It is important to note that women who lost citizenship by marriage and regained it under Cable Act naturalization provisions could file in any naturalization court--regardless of her residence.(12)

So when searching Citizenship and naturalization records, do not overlook any female relatives who may fit the above facts. (I found one and it was full of great information!!!)
Virginia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACTS Regarding American born females marrying husbands who were aliens:</p>
<p>After 1907, marriage determined a woman&#8217;s nationality status completely. Under the act of March 2, 1907, all women acquired their husband&#8217;s nationality upon any marriage occurring after that date. This changed nothing for immigrant women, but U.S.-born citizen women could now lose their citizenship by any marriage to any alien. Most of these women subsequently regained their U.S. citizenship when their husbands naturalized. However, those who married Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, or other men racially ineligible to naturalize forfeited their U.S. citizenship. Similarly, many former U.S. citizen women found themselves married to men who were ineligible to citizenship for some other reason or who simply refused to naturalize. Because the courts held that a husband&#8217;s nationality would always determine that of the wife, a married woman could not legally file for naturalization.(6) </p>
<p>Happily, Congress was at work and on September 22, 1922, passed the Married Women&#8217;s Act, also known as the Cable Act. This 1922 law finally gave each woman a nationality of her own. No marriage since that date has granted U.S. citizenship to any alien woman nor taken it from any U.S.-born women who married an alien eligible to naturalization.(11) Under the new law women became eligible to naturalize on (almost) the same terms as men. The only difference concerned those women whose husbands had already naturalized. If her husband was a citizen, the wife did not need to file a declaration of intention. She could initiate naturalization proceedings with a petition alone (one-paper naturalization). A woman whose husband remained an alien had to start at the beginning, with a declaration of intention. It is important to note that women who lost citizenship by marriage and regained it under Cable Act naturalization provisions could file in any naturalization court&#8211;regardless of her residence.(12)</p>
<p>So when searching Citizenship and naturalization records, do not overlook any female relatives who may fit the above facts. (I found one and it was full of great information!!!)<br />
Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Ross</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53597</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53597</guid>
		<description>This is a good thing for those who are not on Ancestry yet and then maybe they will keep digging? I will spread the word. i have a question:
I found my John McGolrick index card from US Dept. of Labor etc. M-246. It asks for the date and port of arrival in US. It says St. John New Brunswick-Aug. 1855. Does this mean he came into the US in 1855? But he came into St. John at a different time? I seem to think he came into Wisconsin in 1855 from Canada and asked for naturalization in 1878 and the port he arrived in was St. John. One of the news articles I found on him mentioned that he came over from Ireland at a very young age.
Thank you for your help, for I am not used to reading records of this type.
Julie Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good thing for those who are not on Ancestry yet and then maybe they will keep digging? I will spread the word. i have a question:<br />
I found my John McGolrick index card from US Dept. of Labor etc. M-246. It asks for the date and port of arrival in US. It says St. John New Brunswick-Aug. 1855. Does this mean he came into the US in 1855? But he came into St. John at a different time? I seem to think he came into Wisconsin in 1855 from Canada and asked for naturalization in 1878 and the port he arrived in was St. John. One of the news articles I found on him mentioned that he came over from Ireland at a very young age.<br />
Thank you for your help, for I am not used to reading records of this type.<br />
Julie Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rawlins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2011/08/30/take-a-free-ride-with-immigration-records/#comment-53596</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rawlins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=6191#comment-53596</guid>
		<description>Pierce,
I will pass the idea along. 


Penny,
I&#039;m probably not the best person to answer you question, but I&#039;ll see if I can find someone with some ideas. Are you looking for arrivals in Germany or the U.S.?

Carol,
Good point. So much to say about these collections, so little space. Glad you like them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierce,<br />
I will pass the idea along. </p>
<p>Penny,<br />
I&#8217;m probably not the best person to answer you question, but I&#8217;ll see if I can find someone with some ideas. Are you looking for arrivals in Germany or the U.S.?</p>
<p>Carol,<br />
Good point. So much to say about these collections, so little space. Glad you like them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
