<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issues with US 1850, 1860 Census and UK 1871 census.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/#comment-50190</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=4721#comment-50190</guid>
		<description>Judy, we believe we have found the problem with these data collections and hope to have it fixed by tomorrow.

The issues with the 1850, 1860, and 1871 data collections have been fixed.

Anne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, we believe we have found the problem with these data collections and hope to have it fixed by tomorrow.</p>
<p>The issues with the 1850, 1860, and 1871 data collections have been fixed.</p>
<p>Anne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannieB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/#comment-50189</link>
		<dc:creator>DannieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=4721#comment-50189</guid>
		<description>Links to 1850 and 1860 census enumerations now SEEM to be working correctly, on the 4 I just checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links to 1850 and 1860 census enumerations now SEEM to be working correctly, on the 4 I just checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/#comment-50186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=4721#comment-50186</guid>
		<description>The problems include:

a) Wrong Ancestry.com extract is linked to a Census result for a given person in a household.  The wrong link is from both a search result (whether directly in database or from a Tree) and from the link to an already-linked US Census item in individual Tree Overview pages (both in right sidebar list of citations and in the source-citation list);

b) The Ancestry.com extract shows a person at the top who is not in the household listed at the bottom;

c) The location given with the person at the top does not go with the household members listed at the bottom of the extract;

d) The link to actual record ~image~ in the extract page goes with the person listed at the top of the page, not with the folks in the houshold listed at the bottom of the extract (&quot;record&quot;).

It&#039;s a kind of daisy chain of coding errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems include:</p>
<p>a) Wrong Ancestry.com extract is linked to a Census result for a given person in a household.  The wrong link is from both a search result (whether directly in database or from a Tree) and from the link to an already-linked US Census item in individual Tree Overview pages (both in right sidebar list of citations and in the source-citation list);</p>
<p>b) The Ancestry.com extract shows a person at the top who is not in the household listed at the bottom;</p>
<p>c) The location given with the person at the top does not go with the household members listed at the bottom of the extract;</p>
<p>d) The link to actual record ~image~ in the extract page goes with the person listed at the top of the page, not with the folks in the houshold listed at the bottom of the extract (&#8220;record&#8221;).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a kind of daisy chain of coding errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/#comment-50185</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=4721#comment-50185</guid>
		<description>I first encountered this problem late Sunday afternoon. I&#039;m very disappointed that it has taken nearly a full day for the problem to be acknowledged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first encountered this problem late Sunday afternoon. I&#8217;m very disappointed that it has taken nearly a full day for the problem to be acknowledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/10/04/issues-with-us-1850-1860-census-and-uk-1871-census/#comment-50184</link>
		<dc:creator>judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=4721#comment-50184</guid>
		<description>Hopefully Anne you have inadvertently forgot to include the issues with the indexing of the 

London, England, Deaths and Burials, 1813-1980
and
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906

records that i personally emailed you about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully Anne you have inadvertently forgot to include the issues with the indexing of the </p>
<p>London, England, Deaths and Burials, 1813-1980<br />
and<br />
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906</p>
<p>records that i personally emailed you about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
