<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ancestry Search: Improved Collection Filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Ratigan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44418</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Ratigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44418</guid>
		<description>The new newspaper search function is worse than useless! When I enter &quot;Boston, Massachusetts&quot; in the location field, I do not want &quot;Reno, Nevada&quot;!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new newspaper search function is worse than useless! When I enter &#8220;Boston, Massachusetts&#8221; in the location field, I do not want &#8220;Reno, Nevada&#8221;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica nichole barnhill crumbley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44391</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica nichole barnhill crumbley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44391</guid>
		<description>Type your comment here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type your comment here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Rose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44384</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44384</guid>
		<description>I do not find this format easier to use. Is there a way to go back to the old format. I find it is taking me more time to search and my frustration level is rising at every search. I may not renew my subscription to Ancestry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not find this format easier to use. Is there a way to go back to the old format. I find it is taking me more time to search and my frustration level is rising at every search. I may not renew my subscription to Ancestry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44353</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44353</guid>
		<description>I am totaly lost now.  I am getting soundex when I check ezact.  If I wanted soundex in the old one I had that option.  I go looking in the census and you can&#039;t even put where the parents were born, or it is just that I&#039;m not looking in the right place to put it.  
I didn&#039;t have any problem with the old one and wish we could have it back. This new one is making me working harder.  Please give us back the old one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am totaly lost now.  I am getting soundex when I check ezact.  If I wanted soundex in the old one I had that option.  I go looking in the census and you can&#8217;t even put where the parents were born, or it is just that I&#8217;m not looking in the right place to put it.<br />
I didn&#8217;t have any problem with the old one and wish we could have it back. This new one is making me working harder.  Please give us back the old one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Talley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44339</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Talley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44339</guid>
		<description>Is it me, am I missing something when researching a person...I go to a record...
This is not a record that I want to save..
At the upper right hand corner, you have the option to Save this information to your Family Tree, Save this information to your shoebox or save this information to your computer...
WHERE IS THE OPTION TO RETURN TO WHERE YOU WERE WHEN YOU WENT TO THIS INFORMATION?  NO, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE THIS TO MY TREE, NO, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE THIS IN MY SHOEBOX, AND MOST CERTAINLY, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE TO MY COMPUTER..
NOW IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO ME TO HAVE THE OPTION TO RETURN TO SEARCH RESULTS....ITS THERE IN OTHER AREAS BUT WHEN WE ARE AT A CENSUS RECORD..AND DON&#039;T FIND THE INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO OUR FAMILY...WE SHOULD BE ABLE &#039;AT THIS POINT&#039; TO RETURN TO SEARCH RESULT...
THANKS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it me, am I missing something when researching a person&#8230;I go to a record&#8230;<br />
This is not a record that I want to save..<br />
At the upper right hand corner, you have the option to Save this information to your Family Tree, Save this information to your shoebox or save this information to your computer&#8230;<br />
WHERE IS THE OPTION TO RETURN TO WHERE YOU WERE WHEN YOU WENT TO THIS INFORMATION?  NO, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE THIS TO MY TREE, NO, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE THIS IN MY SHOEBOX, AND MOST CERTAINLY, I DO NOT WANT TO SAVE TO MY COMPUTER..<br />
NOW IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO ME TO HAVE THE OPTION TO RETURN TO SEARCH RESULTS&#8230;.ITS THERE IN OTHER AREAS BUT WHEN WE ARE AT A CENSUS RECORD..AND DON&#8217;T FIND THE INFORMATION THAT APPLIES TO OUR FAMILY&#8230;WE SHOULD BE ABLE &#8216;AT THIS POINT&#8217; TO RETURN TO SEARCH RESULT&#8230;<br />
THANKS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannie Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44321</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannie Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44321</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe all the problems I am having with the new changes.  For example, when I try to attach a source to a person in my tree, countless times this results to the screen defaulting to the Ancestry Store!  Then I have to begin anew with the same search.

Further I cannot seem to print some images, like death certificates.  I never had a problem before and I have done all the suggested rememdies and went farther and reinstalled my printer to no avail.  I am so frustrated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe all the problems I am having with the new changes.  For example, when I try to attach a source to a person in my tree, countless times this results to the screen defaulting to the Ancestry Store!  Then I have to begin anew with the same search.</p>
<p>Further I cannot seem to print some images, like death certificates.  I never had a problem before and I have done all the suggested rememdies and went farther and reinstalled my printer to no avail.  I am so frustrated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas_harless</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44316</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas_harless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44316</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what is going on now, I can get anything but Content-type: text/html MySQL seems to be down Too many connections, I sure would like to know what is now going on, I have been with Ancestry for atleast 15 years, this is very bad news for me &amp; my students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what is going on now, I can get anything but Content-type: text/html MySQL seems to be down Too many connections, I sure would like to know what is now going on, I have been with Ancestry for atleast 15 years, this is very bad news for me &amp; my students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44312</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44312</guid>
		<description>Sorry -- &quot;new&quot; search, filters or not just doesn&#039;t cut it. I want OLD search back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8212; &#8220;new&#8221; search, filters or not just doesn&#8217;t cut it. I want OLD search back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Fulmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44277</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Fulmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44277</guid>
		<description>&quot;Old search&quot; is still the best !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Old search&#8221; is still the best !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2010/02/10/ancestry-search-improved-collection-filters/#comment-44249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2939#comment-44249</guid>
		<description>Too many hits - no opportunity to search on married female names and to insert locations they may have lived at time of death.  This is true of Social Security Death Index.
Certainly needs to be &quot;tweaked&quot; to improve the winnowing down of vast amounts of hits.

Have been a member for many years - many of the &quot;improvements&quot; through the years have been worse than the original Ancestry.com search results
of five or ten years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many hits &#8211; no opportunity to search on married female names and to insert locations they may have lived at time of death.  This is true of Social Security Death Index.<br />
Certainly needs to be &#8220;tweaked&#8221; to improve the winnowing down of vast amounts of hits.</p>
<p>Have been a member for many years &#8211; many of the &#8220;improvements&#8221; through the years have been worse than the original Ancestry.com search results<br />
of five or ten years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
