Posted by on December 11, 2009 in Family Tree Maker

Hello Everyone,

We wanted to take a moment and announce something very exciting.

Family Tree Maker is celebrating its 20th Anniversary this year!

Here is some of the history behind the program.

In 1989, the first edition of Family Tree Maker was released by Banner Blue Software. This program ran on DOS, and came on 3.5 and 5.25 floppy disks. Even then, though, the program was designed to help you gather, store, and then share your family history.

First Edition of Family Tree Maker - 1989

First Edition of Family Tree Maker - 1989

Banner Blue was acquired by Broderbund Software in the mid 1990s, after Banner Blue had released a second edition of Family Tree Maker. Broderbund continued to add new developments to Family Tree Maker as technology advanced, releasing a few more versions of the program.

Over the next few years, the Family Tree Maker program was owned by several different companies, but kept getting updated as the resources to build family trees and do family history research advanced with the growth of technology. It eventually came to rest with a company called, which released version 10 in about 2002. Soon after this, was purchased by MyFamily, which later was known as The Generations Network and is now

With the success of the program, which has been a major leader in the family tree building software industry since its beginning, MyFamily kept expanding the features of the program and releasing new versions. In 2006, version 16 was released. The program had expanded from a simple way to print family trees, to a powerful program that could include pictures, create a digital scrap book, and had the power to search the Internet for more information on your family tree.

However, Family Tree maker was still based on old computer programming, and would not be able to keep up with new releases of personal computer technology. We decided it was time for a major revamp of the program to keep it current with the latest updates in computer operating systems. While this wasn’t always a smooth road, we’ve learned a lot and feel we’ve come out with an even better product because of that learning process.

We’re doing our best to continue to integrate the new features and improvements you have suggested as Family Tree Maker users through the years.

Family Tree Maker 2010 - 20 years after the first release

Family Tree Maker 2010 - 20 yrs after first edition

In Family Tree Maker 2010, we have brought back the in-program book building feature, and updated the features of our “Extended Family Tree” chart based on feedback from “All-in-one chart users. (We’re planning a new post that will go over the finer details of these two charts soon.) In addition, we’ve added many new features based on the needs and suggestions of our users.

And so that brings us to this year, where we’re celebrating 20 years of Family Tree Maker growth, and looking forward to even more growth and improvement to come.

Keep your suggestions and comments coming!


Hyatt E. Cayton 

It was interesting to read the history of Family Tree Maker. I have been involved in family history research since 1957. I have owned almost every one of the Family Tree Programs that you mention in your article. I have found it very helpful in my research.

I am currently using the current version: Family Tree Maker 2010. After the initial shock of the major changes from the old format, I have found it really a great program.

Thank You.

Hyatt E. Cayton

December 11, 2009 at 8:06 pm
Carolyn Ramsay 

I have had FTM for most of the time you have been making it. In the section”More” I find I run out of room and have to begin cutting things to make room. I don’t like to leave out a word much less chunks of documents. Have you addressed this yet? I am currently starting over adding pictures and basic info to ancestry. However, there are stacks of documents. Where do I put them? Can I put my old FTM material into the new version without losing things or becoming hopelessly confused? I owuld be happy to buy new but i got v10 and then was so confused I went back to v7. I would hate to have to start over with a new company. Carolyn Ramsay

December 11, 2009 at 10:56 pm
John Donaldson 

# 2 Carolyn

FTM 2010 aallow 1 MB of text in Notes (about 250 pages per person). You can copy and paste between applications

John D

December 12, 2009 at 12:24 am
John Donaldson 

I have also used FTM since version 2 for Windows.

One of the things that has stayed close to FTM is the FTM tech list.

The list was started by Paul Burchfield a techie at Banner Blue in Fremont CA on 6 April 1995.

It is still running and literally thousands of answers have been provied by users. A lot of the high end users also hang out on the list.

You can subscribe on this link

John D

December 12, 2009 at 12:31 am
Daryl Rickards 

Happy 20th

From a very happy camper overall.

Daryl from Oz

December 12, 2009 at 12:56 am
Eckhart von Hirschhausen 

So when will there be a german version of FTM 2010 available?

December 12, 2009 at 2:22 am

I’ve been using the program since version 3. Thank-you for helping me find and document my ancestors and related families.


December 12, 2009 at 10:08 am
Lawrence Bouett 

Like John Donaldson, I, too, have been using FTM since V.2 for DOS. Throughout the many ownership changes, there has always been a dedicated core of programmers who are interested in genealogy who have continuously improved the software.

Congratulations to for this fine program.

Lawrence Bouett
Lafayette, California

December 12, 2009 at 10:42 am
Eleanor Wilkinson 

I have just started using FTM 2010, and find it very good EXCEPT that there appears to be no “descendant report” on the charting options. I am quite disappointed, as this is something I found very useful in the previous editions. You could send it as a pdf file, and a huge amounty of information could be included on a few pages. Does anyone else miss having this on the 2010 FTM?

December 12, 2009 at 11:03 am

Happy 20th may you have many more, FTM to my way of thinking can only get better

December 12, 2009 at 11:03 am
Tony Hansen 

Happy 20th! I’ve also been a pleased customer for many years and versions.

December 12, 2009 at 11:30 am
John Donaldson 

# 9 Eleanor

There are two decsendant reports which are in the collection view under reports.

There are also descendant charts in the chart collection view.

You won’t find any reports in the chart collections and vice versa

Both are in the Publish area along with all the other output options.

Can you see the LH collection view list? It is headed “Publication Types”?

If not drag the LH panel so you can see all the output options

Also look a Publish and its sub heading in Help and/or look at the Publish tutorial in Help on Publish

John D

December 12, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Clem Edwards 

Still have the original 5.25 disks – but nothing to run them on, ha ha. My db is now over 100k persons – back then it was 2,000.

December 12, 2009 at 5:57 pm

I have been using Family Tree Maker since the Banner Blue days and have loved it. I have upgraded to the 2010 and ordered the book with it, but I have never received it.

December 12, 2009 at 6:17 pm
John Wootton 

I have been discovering my ancestry since 1988 and have been using your software over the last 20 years. I would like to upload my tree to but it is too large to transmit. When will we be able to transfer more than 50mb?

December 12, 2009 at 9:09 pm
Donald Hinson 

I created my first family trees on the predecessor software to Family Tree Maker. I believe Banner Blue started off making Organization Chart software.

December 12, 2009 at 10:46 pm
Eleanor Wilkinson 

Thanks, John Donaldson. I failed to see how to open the LH panel – embarrassing! Very happy with FTM 2010 and looking forward to using it – specially with new features.

December 13, 2009 at 9:46 am

I had the original Macintosh Filemaker version. Now I am running VMWare on my mac with 2010. There are things I like about it, but seemed to have lost a lot when books were missing for a few versions. Now I am trying to reconstruct them.

In text mode, the images used to text wrap, and you could include captions. Can’t figure out how to do that again. Thanks

December 13, 2009 at 11:47 am
Paul Burchfield 

It’s incredible that any product is still around (and going strong) after 20 years.

That’s a testament to great and loyal customers. I used to frequently remind my co-workers how lucky we were to be a part of a company who was involved in genealogy. After all, people’s family histories are by definition personal and knowing that we were a part of that process meant we had an extra responsibility to our customers.

There sure were a lot of passionate discussions about Family Tree Maker, the various companies that owned it, and the products that surrounded it. I really don’t think that people care about word processors enough to get as worked up as they did about Family Tree Maker. And that’s what made my time so very special.

It’s wonderful to see the names of people I dealt with in my (almost) almost 10 years. And even though it’s been over 5 years since I left, I still think of my co-workers and customers fondly.

All the best.

Paul Burchfield

December 13, 2009 at 1:35 pm
John Donaldson 

# 19 Paul

Hi Paul

Great to see that you are still lurking. Twenty years is a long time. My wife (who is non-genie) wants to know when I will finish the family tree (silly girl).

Have a great Christmas

John D

December 13, 2009 at 3:50 pm
John Donaldson 

# 18 David

Currently, the text won’t wrap around an image in FTM 2010 books.

The developers are well aware of the issue and I hope it can be addressed, as it dretracts from the book and is not in keeping with how books are expected to look.

John D

December 13, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Carol A. H. 

I owned the first version Banner Blue software of FTM. It was $69.95 on the 5 and 1/4 disks and my first program. It was an ok program. It certainly beat all the others available at costs of hundreds of dollars like Roots and their many versions.

I switched to PAF shortly afterward. Roots had a very steep learning curve. I owned a few versions of it, and while trying to learn it kept using PAF to record my research. I have owned several versions of FTM / FTW and still use PAF. I have versions 2005, 2008 and 2009 of FTW. I don’t want to spend my limited time learning software when I have one which I have customized for me and works just great. I can always GEDCOM my file into anything else.

I have used very complicated software in the circuit design industry and mechanical drafting. That was all the complication I needed in my computer life. I wanted to find my ancestors!

I find the newer versions too slow and I can’t afford to upgrade my hardware continuously. However for folks with newer, faster and bigger computers, especially the newest models, FTW is probably the way to go. I know several folks who use the older version of FTW; tried the new versions but go back to the 2005 version and won’t use the newer versions. I’m really a dinosaur using PAF but the price is right—free—and it is very stable without problems. Great for teaching beginners in genealogy. Then later they can spend money. Drawbacks: you should have a plan how you will document your sources before you start. That is not so easy but anyone can get free help online, by going to the nearest FHC, or using that old thing called the telephone. Oops! We have new telephones: cell phones!

Maybe someday there will be a version of FTW that is pared down to just the bare necessities with the ability to add some modular utilities and not use others. That would interest me.

Off topic: How can anyone have about 150,000 people in a tree? How can they document that many people? The answer: Most trees on Ancestry have no sources. But they are good for a hint. Then I do my own documentation.

December 13, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Marsha Smith 

Why haven’t you made a report writer so we can set up our own reports. I was able to do more in older versions but certainly it’s time for a report writer.

December 15, 2009 at 6:30 pm
John Donaldson 

# 23 Marsha

This is alredy in FTM 2008/09/10 Custom Repots in the Publish Workspace

John D

December 15, 2009 at 7:12 pm
Jack Wilton 

Family Tree Maker is a nice program, I’ve owned 5 or 6 versions now, am also a member of, used to have world membership. Is too bad it’s necessasary to buy every version in order to acquire upgrades. Just purchased FTM 2009 9 months ago, 2010 came out and finally can download images with program. 28.00 + is almost full price by the time you pay for shipping really should offer upgrades for regular longtime customers at a better price.

December 16, 2009 at 6:07 am
Tony Cousins 

John #24

To me a custom report writer is one where you can create a document and then export in a format that you can further ‘tweak’ or add images into the text, e.g. DOC or RTF.

I haven’t managed to find this option when exporting a book in the latest versions of FTM – am I looking in the wrong places?


December 16, 2009 at 9:12 am
John Bradburn 

Congratulations to all at FTM on reaching your twentieth anniversary! I still have the Broderbund set of five 3.5 inch diskettes from 1996 that my first FTM (version 3.2) came on, in 1996 I think.
I really would be happy if you would reinstate one very useful feature which was on the earlier (pre-rewrite) versions of FTM but has since disappeared. That is the ability to create a pedigree (ancestor) chart which also shows the siblings of each ancestor. They were not shown in full tree format which would be too complicated (like the new all-in-one chart!)but they were listed in a block next to the ancestor whose siblings they were. This chart was just a variant of the standard vertical pedigree chart, chosen, if I remember, by checking a tick-box in the left hand selection frame. The only way to view siblings of ancestors on FTM today is to do descendant charts for every early ancestor and this is not a good substitute. Please reinstate this option to the ancestor charts! If you cannot locate this type of chart, I have examples which I could scan and e-mail to you.
Regards, John Bradburn

December 16, 2009 at 11:10 am
Bill Scott 

I have been using FTM since the beginning wwhen I found it supplied what I wanted rather than my own paltry effort. It has been very satisfactory up till 2008 issue which I am afraid had some rather basic omissions such as people of the same name not being listed in chronoligical order. Even more drastic, however, was the 2009 issue with its tragic kinship report which gave gobbledegook results on “relationship” and even more so on “all relationships”. The latest patch seems to have corrected the direct relationship but not the multiple one, which still gives absolutely stupid results.


December 16, 2009 at 12:03 pm
Gary Frechette 

I’m not sure how long I been involved with Family Tree Maker, it is at least 15 years. I’ve looked at other programs, and they can’t compare to FTM.
Thanks for the improvements over the years.

December 16, 2009 at 1:59 pm
John Donaldson 

# 26 TonyC

That is exactly what the custom report does

I assume that you can find the CR in the Publish workspace?

After you create and save your CR, export it to your required format using the Share button

John D

December 16, 2009 at 3:00 pm
John Donaldson 

# 27 John

The vertical ancestor chart has an option to allow you to include siblings of the primary individual

John D

December 16, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Tony Cousins 

Hi John #30
Does that work once you’ve created a book too?

I’ve been using export.


December 16, 2009 at 3:59 pm
John Donaldson 

# 32 Tony

Sort of yes but the RFT is “very ropey”

The book can of course be exported as PDF

John D

December 17, 2009 at 3:21 am
Tony Cousins 

Hi John #33
I found the ‘share’ button, it was ‘hidden’ well away from all the other buttons 🙂

Unless you have a full copy of Adobe Acrobat you can’t insert images or edit a PDF file and as you say – the RTF file is strange looking in the way it seems to utilize tables for some of the text.

I guess we are supposed to use the ACOM publishing site 😉


December 17, 2009 at 9:10 am

I must be the strange one out there! I detest ftm 2010! I want 06 that works with windows 7. I don’t want it to look like ancestry—I’ve already deleted everything I put there because I didn’t like that format……

December 17, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Jeanne Maschari 

Congratulations on your anniversary. I have been a FTM user since the very beginning. I love the program and can’t imagine how I would have spent my time over the last 20 years without it. I have met many distant family members and made many friends because of using this software.

Thanks and keep it up!

Jeanne Maschari

December 17, 2009 at 7:13 pm
John Donaldson 

# 35 dipasti

I understand that if you install the Vista patch to FTM 2006 it will be fully functional (including PDF export) in W 7.

I haven’t tried it though.

John D

December 18, 2009 at 5:04 am
Peggy Baer 

I use Apple computers and have always used Reunion for genealogy. Is there an Apple version of FTM? What are the basic differences between the two programs? How difficult or easy would it be to switch from Reunion to FTM?

December 18, 2009 at 1:29 pm
John Donaldson 

# 38 Peggy

Reunion is a fine Genealogy program which should satisfy your needs.

Not sure anyone can answer the basic differences question as both programs are extremely rich in features.

Perhaps the only key difference is that FTM, being owned by, can seamlessly search and merge paid database records into FTM.

If you wished to use FTM on your Apple you would need to install a Windows emulator like “Parallels” then a copy of Windows.

Personally I don’t think that is worth the hassle.

Reunion can create a GEDCOM file that FTM can read.

Maybe one day will develop an “FTM for the Mac” then it will be a real competition between Reunion and FTM, but until that occurs, (if it ever does), either stay with Reunion on your Mac but if you are realy keen to try FTM, pick up a PC and load FTM onto it.

John D

December 18, 2009 at 3:57 pm

Michelle &, Congratulations.

Although my interest in family genealogy has only peeked in the past last five years–I am pleased with my decision to use FTM five years ago to help me with this quest. I have been able to combine numerous family records that go back centuries as well as find additional interesting details and expand the tree beyond those family records/knowledge through the integration of FTM with Ancestry’s website.

I look forward to FTM and other offerings continuing to be enhanced over the next 20 years.

December 18, 2009 at 8:56 pm
John Donaldson 

# 40 Lynn

“sorta addictive isn’t it”?

And it is a lot of fun

John D

December 19, 2009 at 1:49 pm

#41 John D

Yes, it is addictive … 🙂

December 19, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Tyler Rasmussen 

When will the FTM SDK finally be released? The new FTM has been built to have plugins since in 2008 release, and we have yet to see an SDK! With the 2010 release plus update, FTM should be stable and there should have been time to finish the development of the SDK.

December 19, 2009 at 10:13 pm
Mark Devlin 

Paul #13

I agree with you 100% Paul. Even though I only spent 5 years working with Family Tree Maker, it was a fun ride. I loved the people we worked with and those we helped and served.

Best wishes FTM.

December 19, 2009 at 11:24 pm
Rose Olson 

I was using one of the old family tree maker programs which I found
very easy to deal with. changed to
2010 a week ago –what a shock.
totally different and I don’t know
where to start. I have transferred
all my files to it BUT. I went to
order the official guide for 2010
and found out it cannot be mailed
to Canada. What do I do now as I
want to use new FTM.

December 20, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Candace Clawson 

I am very impressed ! I recentely purchased family treemaker 2010. my niece will be helping me to install it. the features are very interesting. right now i have family treemaker 16, it still works on the site. but i would like to bring it up to date with the new version. we recently upgraded our operating system on our computer to windows 7. anyway Happy Birthday Ancestry.Com ! Let’s see another 20 yrs ! Oh and thank you for helping me to find out who i really am !

December 20, 2009 at 1:25 pm
John Donaldson 

# 45 Rose

Have you tried ordering it through Amazon?

It is a good book, about 460 pages or so.

If you are really stuck, Victorian GUM Inc in Melbourne, Australia has it in stock. It could be mailed to you.

There is a downloadable Geeting started guide on this link

It also has links to webinars and tutorials. You also have tutorials under help in your FTM 2010

John D

December 20, 2009 at 3:08 pm
laura foenander 

Saw the FTM 2010 tutorial ..
i am getting a programme late Jan..
looking forward to using it .. it looks great
updating from 2006

Happy 20th

laura / Australia

December 20, 2009 at 11:06 pm
Ray Boutwell 

I wish 2010 had a columnar custom report like Ver16 which had the capability of adjusting the column width. It also had the capability of putting any fact in any column including the sources and places. It would be nice to have a column which could give the total number of media relating to a person which in turn would point out which people did not have media. FTM is developing into a very capable application. Congrats

December 21, 2009 at 11:27 am
Kathy Marie 


24 Written by:
John Donaldson


Posted on:
December 15, 2009 at 7:12 pm
# 23 Marsha

This is alredy in FTM 2008/09/10 Custom Repots in the Publish Workspace

John D




December 23, 2009 at 10:15 am
Kathy Marie 



49 Written by:
Ray Boutwell

Posted on:
December 21, 2009 at 11:27 am
I wish 2010 had a columnar custom report like Ver16 which had the capability of adjusting the column width. It also had the capability of putting any fact in any column including the sources and places. It would be nice to have a column which could give the total number of media relating to a person which in turn would point out which people did not have media. FTM is developing into a very capable application. Congrats

December 23, 2009 at 10:20 am
John Donaldson 

# 50 Cathy

I think that my reply was accurate in that the correspondent was essentially asking where the custom report was in FTM 2010.

The question was not about how good or bad it is, hence I did not comment in this area.

I agree that the CR needs work, and I am sure that this will be addressed in a future enhancement.

Incidentally, posting in CAPS generally implies “shouting”. I am not sure if that was your intention.

John D

December 23, 2009 at 2:18 pm

As you determine and prioritze future enhancements, consider an iPhone App. Although I believe other enhancements are much more important, iPhone App would further open the possibilities of how, when and where individuals could use offerings as well as share them with others.
… Sent to you via my iPhone

December 24, 2009 at 9:14 pm