Comments on: Updated Family Tree Preview http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=updated-family-tree-preview The official blog of Ancestry Mon, 25 May 2015 23:15:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: David Wendellhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42792 David Wendell Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:53:41 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42792 On your page titled “Oregon Death Index” it says “More information, including copies of original certificates, may be obtained by contacting the Oregon Health Department, Center for Health Statistics, 800 NE Oregon Street, Portland, Oregon, 97232; (503) 731-4027.

Visit them on the Web at http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/vital.html.”

This is incorrect. That website is of the Oregon State Archives, not the Oregon Health Department.

]]>
By: Billie Ransonhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42702 Billie Ranson Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:10:22 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42702 The “Save Person to Another Tree” option no longer works. I don’t care about saving from member trees but want to be able to move a person’s data from one of my own trees to another.

]]>
By: Jadehttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42701 Jade Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:00:44 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42701 Kenny,

Thanks for your #50. I am running Firefox 2-point-something. It is also not viewable using IE6. I don’t use the pedigree view much anyway.

IE7 and later are such memory hogs, can’t run on my desktop.

]]>
By: Kenny Freestonehttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42700 Kenny Freestone Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:08:42 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42700 Laura (#47) – the list of names is in the top right section of the page (next to the “Home Person” link). There you’ll find a box saying “find a person in this tree”. When you put your mouse in that box the box expands to show the link to all the people in your tree.

Mary (#48) – It sounds like you might be talking about our desktop software Family Tree Maker. Family Tree Maker software is a separate product from our online Ancestry Member Trees tool. While Family Tree Maker must be purchased, all members of Ancestry.com can freely use Ancestry Member Trees.

Jade (#49) – We are investigating a fix for the New Tree Viewer for Firefox version 3.0. If that is the version you are using you could try the latest version of Firefox (3.5), which by all reports is working very well.

]]>
By: Jadehttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42696 Jade Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:56:01 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42696 I can’t view the new display at all in Firefox.

]]>
By: Mary Pathttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42687 Mary Pat Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:31:56 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42687 I purchased ancestry 2009 and hated it and had to reinstall my old software. I now have a new laptop and find the old software is no longer compatible. After reading user comments I think it prudent to wait until and later version comes out and continue with my desktop and old version which is sad.

]]>
By: Laura Slavinhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42670 Laura Slavin Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:52:27 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42670 I am wondering where the list names on the family tree now is. I found the list helpful.

]]>
By: Gayhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42652 Gay Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:34:00 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42652 I find new version almost unuseable and very slow. Liked the 2006 versionfor it simplicity. Maybe if the 2010 version came with directions but it did not.
I seem to be using ancestry.com and hand coping it over. Would love it if online trees let you print working reports.

]]>
By: Andy Hatchetthttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42599 Andy Hatchett Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:43:22 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42599 Tony Re: # 44

I try to be kind… on occasion ;)

]]>
By: Tony Cousinshttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/12/04/updated-family-tree-preview/#comment-42594 Tony Cousins Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:19:32 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=2515#comment-42594 Andy #42

You go Andy, but only $100, you are too kind :)

TonyC

]]>