Comments on: U.S. Content Update: Alabama State Census & Returns from U.S. Military Posts http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts The official blog of Ancestry.com Wed, 23 Jul 2014 04:34:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2 By: Bobhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38400 Bob Fri, 22 May 2009 15:05:28 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38400 Chris the new records database
“History of the Shaw Family” is this a joke or is it a example of the fine work that Ancestry is giving to it’s paying customers? It needs to be REMOVED and rescanned go and see if you can read it!

]]>
By: Pauline Braceyhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38379 Pauline Bracey Mon, 18 May 2009 21:28:28 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38379 It was my understanding when I started my tree that no one except the people that you invite onto your tree would be able to see living people information. I just discovered someone has gotten to my living people information. I don’t mind sharing information about dead relatives. So how do I fix it so this doesn’t happen again. Thank-you!!

]]>
By: Jerri Oyamahttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38375 Jerri Oyama Mon, 18 May 2009 18:47:29 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38375 I just spent 45 min. reading all about
and viewing the various instruction
videos only to discover I cannot
participate in this project because I
use an Apple comp. instead of a wonky
windows system!!!!!!!!! Why is this
not stressed in the beginning and why
is it so at all!
I really wanted to work on this project
instead I feel resentment toward
Ancestry.

]]>
By: Chris Lydiksenhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38373 Chris Lydiksen Mon, 18 May 2009 16:25:02 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38373 Reed, thanks for your input. Because of your comments we are working on a new browse structure for the collection.

]]>
By: Mary Womackhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38371 Mary Womack Mon, 18 May 2009 13:37:17 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38371 I do not know why my “website” is listed as Familytreemaker since I have had abslutely no luck ever with Familytreemaker.

]]>
By: Reedhttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38333 Reed Wed, 13 May 2009 23:50:46 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38333 The Returns from Military Posts would be immediately more useful if there was a simple list of the various Posts organized alphabetically by state or territory and including the dates of each Post’s returns. (As it is one has to look at the individual rolls to see which post were in which state and at what times.)

]]>
By: Christinehttp://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/05/12/us-content-update-alabama-state-census-returns-from-us-military-posts/#comment-38323 Christine Wed, 13 May 2009 02:30:19 +0000 http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/?p=1250#comment-38323 Did I miss something on returning a keyed project? I spent hours interpreting some of the slave manifests, and when I finished, they went nowhere. Then when a tool update was pushed at me, I get a response that what I keyed was old and had to be returned for others to key. What happened to the work I did (twice actually)?

]]>