I had posted previously about our new online Messages feature and I just wanted to give an update about some improvements we’ve made to it, largely based on your feedback.
The improvement I am most excited about is the addition of “Ancestor Links” in messages. Some of the member trees on Ancestry.com are private and to learn more about one of your ancestors that may be in the tree you need to contact the owner of the tree. If you choose to do this, we will add a link in your message that goes to the ancestor you were interested in viewing. This is what it looks like in the contact form:

(If you decide you don’t want to include the link for whatever reason just click on the ‘X’ next to the link.)
When the owner of the tree receives your message they will have the link to the person in their tree so that they can easily look at the ancestor you are asking about. We’ll also include a link in the message that lets them easily invite you to their tree, if they decide to do that. This is what it looks like to the person receiving the message:

In addition to adding the Ancestor Links, we’ve also made the following improvements:
We hope you continue to enjoy the Messages feature and that you are able to connect with many other members who are doing similar research.
Nice Features. Hope this gets more people involved and chatting with common people with same interest. Had some luck with doing Dar Genealogy.
I have just started using the new message feature and wish there was another way to let someone know they have a message, say to their personal email address, instead of waiting for them to log in to check their ancestry inbox. Not everyone logs in everyday but they do check their personal email. So fustrating to try to contact someone and not getting a response because they do not know they have a message waiting.
What happened to Public Records. It’s not there today and I use it a lot.
I wish it were possible to get something when wanting to contact an owner of a public tree while browsing their tree. For instance, I’m looking at Bob in a public tree and it’s the same as the Bob in my tree. I’d like to ask the tree owner about Bob and wouldn’t it be great if the same linking info was available.
I love this new feature. I’ve already been contacted, re: someone in my tree
Diane #4
Try this link and join the many people upset by the removal of the USPRI database.
TonyC
I like the fact that I can create a folder to save my incoming messages to. However, I can’t move my replies into my folders. If you receive a lot of messages, you are unable to manage the sent messages since you are unable to delete or move them. Adding the ability to move your sent messages to your folders would be great.
I agree with Denise. Also I would like to be able to empty or remove messages from the Deleted file. One other thing it would be nice to be able to make Sub Folders under the new folder thats created.
#10 Tom – Great idea on sub folders. Some files are more appropriate as sub files of a main subject or location folder. Also, I would like to be able to rearrange the order of my folders. When created, the folders can be alphabetized, but later additions can not. There is no way to insert them in a preferred sequence. Flexibility is needed here. Another thought is that the selections for “Sent” and “Deleted” should be located at the top of the page under “Inbox.” That would save scrolling to the bottom of the page each time to find sent mail. Why not take a look at email browser “favorites” or “bookmarks” for inspiration in consolidating/rolling up subfiles into major file categories. Thanks. Happy programming!
Note: I like the Message System. Though, many days go by: Before I can answer them. Mainly because they appear in my Friends Free Account. Which, I merge all my Gedcom with her Gedcom to make up a Tree of over 140,000 names… Is their a way! a Co-owner of a Tree get notifications of messages incoming. When my Partner/Cousin/Friend is indisposed. Grieving of a Recent death in her family? Trying to stay on Top of things and it’s a little difficult. Thanks for understanding… Re: LMCB the big tree on Ancestry.com
David:
I am completly frustrated by the inability to make my E-mail address visable with my family tree on Ancestry.Com !!!
And why is my E-mail address repeatably striped from replys to messages from other Ancestry members (thru Ancestry.co) wishing to contact me about my ancestry tree?
I assume that their attempts to send their E-mail addresses to me via
Ancestrys “system” is also defeated.
I have indicated that I wish my E-mail address to be publicly visable
in “personal preferences”
I have a valid World membership with
Ancestry.Com and intensly dislike
Ancestrys consistantly censoring my
correspondence with other Ancestry
members.
Please let me know if this is a system that cannot be remedied as it is of primary importance to me.
Thank you.
Robert R McCausland ADCS
Please find my Ancestors,my mother’s father name, her grandparent names.Carney,Jones.and Taylor.THEY All deceased.
[...] David Graham placed an observative post today on Ancestry.com Blog – » Some improvements to the online Messages featureHere’s a quick excerptSome of the member trees on Ancestry.com are private and to learn more about one of your ancestors that may be in the tree you need to contact the owner of the tree. If you choose to do this, we will add a link in your message that goes … [...]
Looking for help with a specific problem? Try contacting Customer Service.
Discuss more Ancestry.com topics in the Message Boards.
Here you will find informational, and sometimes fun, posts from the folks behind the scenes here at Ancestry.com. We hope you’ll notice just how passionate we are about family history and about the products we’re building to help connect families over distance and time.
Visit Ancestry.com
I’m still getting somewhat hostile Obama deniers, those that may be related or researching the President’s maternal line, which is presumptively white, some back to Plymouth Rock and Jamestown. Can we have a well worded short article pointing out that to be related to the President is not to be linked to, Heaven forbid, some tawdry lineage. You would think anyone would be proud. Thank you.