<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Performance Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=site-performance-update</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-36901</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-36901</guid>
		<description>I have Family Origins software and have been putting obits in the notes section for death.

When I uploaded my material to the 
site I&#039;ve lost all the notes that I had.   I&#039;ve also got tons of other notes that have not been transferred to the tree online.  

Do I have to retype all these notes individually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Family Origins software and have been putting obits in the notes section for death.</p>
<p>When I uploaded my material to the<br />
site I&#8217;ve lost all the notes that I had.   I&#8217;ve also got tons of other notes that have not been transferred to the tree online.  </p>
<p>Do I have to retype all these notes individually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-35343</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-35343</guid>
		<description>Just a note to let you know that the hints have returned for now.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note to let you know that the hints have returned for now.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-34090</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-34090</guid>
		<description>I am also a long tme subscriber to Ancestry.com. For whatever reason, this site continues to get slower.   Each click just hangs there forever. I really don&#039;t have the patience to wait since I remember what is used to be like when I could see several pages in the time it takes to load one now. Consequently, I haven&#039;t been using the site as much, which means I will not resubscribe unless the speed improves significantly. I also teach genealogy classes - yesterday I taught 30 novices - and I&#039;m telling them to get a library card &amp; log onto Heritage Quest for free, at least until Ancestry.com regains it&#039;s former speed. Blame the server, blame the browser, blame Norton, blame whatever, but I blame Ancestry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also a long tme subscriber to Ancestry.com. For whatever reason, this site continues to get slower.   Each click just hangs there forever. I really don&#8217;t have the patience to wait since I remember what is used to be like when I could see several pages in the time it takes to load one now. Consequently, I haven&#8217;t been using the site as much, which means I will not resubscribe unless the speed improves significantly. I also teach genealogy classes &#8211; yesterday I taught 30 novices &#8211; and I&#8217;m telling them to get a library card &amp; log onto Heritage Quest for free, at least until Ancestry.com regains it&#8217;s former speed. Blame the server, blame the browser, blame Norton, blame whatever, but I blame Ancestry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ralston</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33929</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ralston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33929</guid>
		<description>Dave, with comment #60

Contact me and I can help you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, with comment #60</p>
<p>Contact me and I can help you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ralston</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33927</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ralston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33927</guid>
		<description>Dave, with comment #60

I have been into computers for years and have a suggestion. Take your Norton and put it in the trash can. You are throwing good money away for using it. And, the biggest problem with it, is that it hogs your system and slows it down badly. Simply trash it. If you need Anti-virus protection, use the free stuff. You can&#039;t beat ThreatFire and Avast. Just Google them and download for free. I never have a problem with viruses or adware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, with comment #60</p>
<p>I have been into computers for years and have a suggestion. Take your Norton and put it in the trash can. You are throwing good money away for using it. And, the biggest problem with it, is that it hogs your system and slows it down badly. Simply trash it. If you need Anti-virus protection, use the free stuff. You can&#8217;t beat ThreatFire and Avast. Just Google them and download for free. I never have a problem with viruses or adware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave roll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33923</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave roll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33923</guid>
		<description>Eric,
I to have tried tech support with no results.  My Problem is the same as everybody else very slow and will not load hints.  Tech people said it was a problem with Norton.  I have had as much trouble trying to  get thru to them for help.  I am a novice and have problems making changes with my system.  I need help from your end if that is possible.
Thanks for your time.
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
I to have tried tech support with no results.  My Problem is the same as everybody else very slow and will not load hints.  Tech people said it was a problem with Norton.  I have had as much trouble trying to  get thru to them for help.  I am a novice and have problems making changes with my system.  I need help from your end if that is possible.<br />
Thanks for your time.<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33811</guid>
		<description>Eric,

Thank you SO much for fixing the pop-up on the initial page that was interrupting our log-in attempts (#5 comment). I greatly appreciate that one frustration being eliminated.

Although it seems to us - at times - that nothing is being done; I know these problems are difficult to assess and reconfigure. I thank you for your efforts.

Regards,
Sherry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Thank you SO much for fixing the pop-up on the initial page that was interrupting our log-in attempts (#5 comment). I greatly appreciate that one frustration being eliminated.</p>
<p>Although it seems to us &#8211; at times &#8211; that nothing is being done; I know these problems are difficult to assess and reconfigure. I thank you for your efforts.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Sherry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol A. H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33771</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol A. H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33771</guid>
		<description>A few minutes ago I was working on a tree I have in Ancestry Family Trees.  I tried to attach a &quot;hint&quot; of the 1930 census to a person.  It would not save it so I walked away from my computer.  I came back in 10 minutes and it still had not saved the hint.  It absolutly stalled.  I had to log off the Ancestry and log back on. but still no luck.

i have experienced slowness in attaching hints before but this is the first time it stalled totally.  It is just past midnight here on the &quot;left coast&quot; and I thought fewer people would be on the site, and it would be faster.  I checked Eric&#039;s post about maintenance but it is early Sunday moring and not on his schedule.   

What new surprizes are just around the corner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few minutes ago I was working on a tree I have in Ancestry Family Trees.  I tried to attach a &#8220;hint&#8221; of the 1930 census to a person.  It would not save it so I walked away from my computer.  I came back in 10 minutes and it still had not saved the hint.  It absolutly stalled.  I had to log off the Ancestry and log back on. but still no luck.</p>
<p>i have experienced slowness in attaching hints before but this is the first time it stalled totally.  It is just past midnight here on the &#8220;left coast&#8221; and I thought fewer people would be on the site, and it would be faster.  I checked Eric&#8217;s post about maintenance but it is early Sunday moring and not on his schedule.   </p>
<p>What new surprizes are just around the corner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ralston</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33600</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ralston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33600</guid>
		<description>Eric,
I guess I can best sum up the customer&#039;s point of view:
STOP ACTING LIKE MICROSOFT, quit putting out junk programs until they are proofed as &quot;working&quot;. This whole mess over the last few years, stems from management that obviously has one thing on their mind, money. When you have a system that works, it is like a car that runs good, DON&#039;T TAKE IT IN TO FIX IT. If you folks would set up a site that actually lets the customer tell you what they would like, survey the customers to see if the majority indeed would like to have it and then do your homework and make it happen. The big thing that really kills you is constant promises, just like with FTM 2008, always telling us &quot;it&#039;s coming soon&quot;. Just like Ken said in #56, this new search thing you came up with is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
I guess I can best sum up the customer&#8217;s point of view:<br />
STOP ACTING LIKE MICROSOFT, quit putting out junk programs until they are proofed as &#8220;working&#8221;. This whole mess over the last few years, stems from management that obviously has one thing on their mind, money. When you have a system that works, it is like a car that runs good, DON&#8217;T TAKE IT IN TO FIX IT. If you folks would set up a site that actually lets the customer tell you what they would like, survey the customers to see if the majority indeed would like to have it and then do your homework and make it happen. The big thing that really kills you is constant promises, just like with FTM 2008, always telling us &#8220;it&#8217;s coming soon&#8221;. Just like Ken said in #56, this new search thing you came up with is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/02/06/site-performance-update/#comment-33599</guid>
		<description>Eric, 

I have been posting on this blog about poor performance, slow performance, poor to nonexistant customer service,and getting answers to my questions that don&#039;t answer the question.  The last time I posted, I said I would not post any further messages because it didn&#039;t seem to get any results.  Something must have hit a nerve, because the post was removed.  I guess TNG doesn&#039;t like to hear the truth anymore.  Well, before I cancel my subscription March 1,  here&#039;s a few things you folks need to understand.  

I can only speak for myself, but until TNG &quot;updated&quot; the home page,everything was fine.  The addition of the &quot;new search&quot; was actually like pressing the self destruct button.   It appears to me that when someone at TNG gets a brain storm, they throw together a program, uploads it to the website and wait for the customers to find the bugs so you can patch/repair the program.  Nothing  &quot;new&quot; in the last couple of years has worked as advertised.  We pay a substantial amount of money to use this site for research, not debugging programs.  Nothing should be uploaded until it is thoroughly tested.  Granted, there will be minor glitches in any new program, but what we have here is not minor.  

If you really want to improve this sight, drop the new search, the new home page, and any other &quot;Updates&quot; you have made in the last couple of months and start over.  

I realize most of these folks may be content to spend good money to help TNG fix these fiascos, but I can&#039;t afford it.  I&#039;ve lost countless hours of research time trying to get search engines to work and pages to load, and holding for the greatest of all TNG&#039;s disasters - &quot;Customer Service&quot;.  What an insult.  

It has been suggested several times on this blog that TNG should implement a  program to suspend the subscriptions of your loyal customers until the site is operating as advertised.  The silence has been deafening.  Canceling this after eight years will put me light years behind in my research, but I don&#039;t have to listen to bogus excuses or incompetent company representatives talk down to their customers about why the site doesn&#039;t work as promised.  You (TNG) say you listen to your customers.  I say your hearing is selective.  The customers have two choices - stay for more of the same or leave. Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, </p>
<p>I have been posting on this blog about poor performance, slow performance, poor to nonexistant customer service,and getting answers to my questions that don&#8217;t answer the question.  The last time I posted, I said I would not post any further messages because it didn&#8217;t seem to get any results.  Something must have hit a nerve, because the post was removed.  I guess TNG doesn&#8217;t like to hear the truth anymore.  Well, before I cancel my subscription March 1,  here&#8217;s a few things you folks need to understand.  </p>
<p>I can only speak for myself, but until TNG &#8220;updated&#8221; the home page,everything was fine.  The addition of the &#8220;new search&#8221; was actually like pressing the self destruct button.   It appears to me that when someone at TNG gets a brain storm, they throw together a program, uploads it to the website and wait for the customers to find the bugs so you can patch/repair the program.  Nothing  &#8220;new&#8221; in the last couple of years has worked as advertised.  We pay a substantial amount of money to use this site for research, not debugging programs.  Nothing should be uploaded until it is thoroughly tested.  Granted, there will be minor glitches in any new program, but what we have here is not minor.  </p>
<p>If you really want to improve this sight, drop the new search, the new home page, and any other &#8220;Updates&#8221; you have made in the last couple of months and start over.  </p>
<p>I realize most of these folks may be content to spend good money to help TNG fix these fiascos, but I can&#8217;t afford it.  I&#8217;ve lost countless hours of research time trying to get search engines to work and pages to load, and holding for the greatest of all TNG&#8217;s disasters &#8211; &#8220;Customer Service&#8221;.  What an insult.  </p>
<p>It has been suggested several times on this blog that TNG should implement a  program to suspend the subscriptions of your loyal customers until the site is operating as advertised.  The silence has been deafening.  Canceling this after eight years will put me light years behind in my research, but I don&#8217;t have to listen to bogus excuses or incompetent company representatives talk down to their customers about why the site doesn&#8217;t work as promised.  You (TNG) say you listen to your customers.  I say your hearing is selective.  The customers have two choices &#8211; stay for more of the same or leave. Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
