<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ancestry.com DNA welcomes you to our new BLOG home and much more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:54:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Jessen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-37344</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Jessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-37344</guid>
		<description>Brett, 23andMe does not type Y chromosome STRs like we do; furthermore, with few common mtDNA SNPs between us, squeezing their data into our format is not a viable option.  We are working together with 23andMe on some future collaborative considerations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett, 23andMe does not type Y chromosome STRs like we do; furthermore, with few common mtDNA SNPs between us, squeezing their data into our format is not a viable option.  We are working together with 23andMe on some future collaborative considerations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett V.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-37210</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-37210</guid>
		<description>Wendy, I&#039;m a paid subscriber to Ancestry.com, but prior to joining had a DNA test through 23andMe.  Though they are Ancestry.com&#039;s official DNA partner, transferring the DNA results is a challenge.  First, 23andMe is not listed as an provider option, and one therefore must to choose &quot;Other.&quot;  Then, when you get to the &quot;Transfer Your DNA&quot; page, the marker value drop downs do not correspond with 23andMe&#039;s &quot;Raw Data&quot; report...  Isn&#039;t there an easier way to transfer my 23andMe data?  Shouldn&#039;t I be able to migrate the data, as you are both partner companies?  Thanks, and I look forward to your thoughts....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy, I&#8217;m a paid subscriber to Ancestry.com, but prior to joining had a DNA test through 23andMe.  Though they are Ancestry.com&#8217;s official DNA partner, transferring the DNA results is a challenge.  First, 23andMe is not listed as an provider option, and one therefore must to choose &#8220;Other.&#8221;  Then, when you get to the &#8220;Transfer Your DNA&#8221; page, the marker value drop downs do not correspond with 23andMe&#8217;s &#8220;Raw Data&#8221; report&#8230;  Isn&#8217;t there an easier way to transfer my 23andMe data?  Shouldn&#8217;t I be able to migrate the data, as you are both partner companies?  Thanks, and I look forward to your thoughts&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Jessen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-32825</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Jessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-32825</guid>
		<description>Ancestry.com DNA provides an indication of your ancestral haplogroup and reveals your precise DNA values.  Although deep ancestral geographic information is provided, precise tribal or ethnicity breakdown is not a result of the paternal and maternal testing offered.  For more information, please visit our &lt;a href=&quot;http://dna.ancestry.com/faq.aspx#testingtribe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FAQs&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ancestry.com DNA provides an indication of your ancestral haplogroup and reveals your precise DNA values.  Although deep ancestral geographic information is provided, precise tribal or ethnicity breakdown is not a result of the paternal and maternal testing offered.  For more information, please visit our <a href="http://dna.ancestry.com/faq.aspx#testingtribe" rel="nofollow">FAQs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Dutson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-32635</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Dutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-32635</guid>
		<description>Why do I not receive a percentage breakdown of your ethnicity, race or geographic origin with any Ancestry.com DNA test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I not receive a percentage breakdown of your ethnicity, race or geographic origin with any Ancestry.com DNA test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Belmont</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Belmont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31969</guid>
		<description>I find I must &quot;eat crow&quot; just checked again and found that they restored the search surnames so that the list comes up now. Thanks ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find I must &#8220;eat crow&#8221; just checked again and found that they restored the search surnames so that the list comes up now. Thanks <img src='http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Belmont</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Belmont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31968</guid>
		<description>I, too, find the new look confusing. I find I have to do more to get less. So far, I&#039;ve been able to use the old look. Hope they don&#039;t take that away, but rather let suscribers have the choice of new or old. That being said, I also have a complaint about the new DNA look. In the past, I have been able to type in my surname and find others with same. I don&#039;t have the need for groups at this time, but would like to see other surnames who have tested. When I type in my surname, Belmont, I come up with all kinds of results mostly for Belmont County in a multitude of states. Don&#039;t want that - only want surnames. Have talked with dna@ancestry.com and while they have been very nice, they have no answers. Very frustrating to say the least. New is not alway better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, find the new look confusing. I find I have to do more to get less. So far, I&#8217;ve been able to use the old look. Hope they don&#8217;t take that away, but rather let suscribers have the choice of new or old. That being said, I also have a complaint about the new DNA look. In the past, I have been able to type in my surname and find others with same. I don&#8217;t have the need for groups at this time, but would like to see other surnames who have tested. When I type in my surname, Belmont, I come up with all kinds of results mostly for Belmont County in a multitude of states. Don&#8217;t want that &#8211; only want surnames. Have talked with <a href="mailto:dna@ancestry.com">dna@ancestry.com</a> and while they have been very nice, they have no answers. Very frustrating to say the least. New is not alway better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Demara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31940</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Demara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31940</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a beginner and just wanting to know my family and if in fact I&#039;m a chippewea indian.  I know I&#039;ve found my deceased father who died in 1974 and a grandfather same name born in 1881.  I was told many years ago from my mother that I had both grandparents that were indian.  As I&#039;ve gotten olden with children and grandchildren, I&#039;m doing more searching.  I never met my father,I just found out the year he died yesterday.  I&#039;m hoping from this site maybe a relative will be looking and the site will work for me and my family.  I do appreciate this site and the helpful hints.



Thanks Again,    


Kathleen Demara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a beginner and just wanting to know my family and if in fact I&#8217;m a chippewea indian.  I know I&#8217;ve found my deceased father who died in 1974 and a grandfather same name born in 1881.  I was told many years ago from my mother that I had both grandparents that were indian.  As I&#8217;ve gotten olden with children and grandchildren, I&#8217;m doing more searching.  I never met my father,I just found out the year he died yesterday.  I&#8217;m hoping from this site maybe a relative will be looking and the site will work for me and my family.  I do appreciate this site and the helpful hints.</p>
<p>Thanks Again,    </p>
<p>Kathleen Demara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Jessen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31833</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Jessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31833</guid>
		<description>Maurice, a link on the homepage entitled &quot;Transfer Results From Other Lab&quot; will take you through the process of adding results from another lab.  Not all labs are yet represented, however, at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maurice, a link on the homepage entitled &#8220;Transfer Results From Other Lab&#8221; will take you through the process of adding results from another lab.  Not all labs are yet represented, however, at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice L. Sarles, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31824</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice L. Sarles, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31824</guid>
		<description>I submitted my DNA to Sorenson (SMGF) and eventually my Y-DNA results appreared in their Y-DNA Database.  Recently I submitted my DNA to GeneTree and now have my mtDNA results.  How do I get that into into my Ancestry profile without having to pay over and over again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I submitted my DNA to Sorenson (SMGF) and eventually my Y-DNA results appreared in their Y-DNA Database.  Recently I submitted my DNA to GeneTree and now have my mtDNA results.  How do I get that into into my Ancestry profile without having to pay over and over again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Jessen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/14/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/comment-page-1/#comment-31746</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Jessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2009/01/13/ancestrycom-dna-welcomes-you-to-our-new-blog-home-and-much-more/#comment-31746</guid>
		<description>Keith, this blog is about Ancestry.com DNA and the DNA service.  Your question would best be directed to Anne Mitchell http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/category/ancestry-com/search/.  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, this blog is about Ancestry.com DNA and the DNA service.  Your question would best be directed to Anne Mitchell <a href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/category/ancestry-com/search/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/category/ancestry-com/search/</a>.  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
