<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On The Road&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-the-road</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenecia Layman Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-33232</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenecia Layman Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-33232</guid>
		<description>I am a member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isobell Millsap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-20332</link>
		<dc:creator>Isobell Millsap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-20332</guid>
		<description>i WISH THERE WAS A WAY TO AD SMALL PERSONAL COMMENTS TO THE PERSON&#039;S PAGE THAT ARE KNOWN BY FAMILY MEMBERS. i GUESS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE? MAYBE THERE IS AND I HAVE MISSED THE INSTRUCTIONS. CEIM2634</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i WISH THERE WAS A WAY TO AD SMALL PERSONAL COMMENTS TO THE PERSON&#8217;S PAGE THAT ARE KNOWN BY FAMILY MEMBERS. i GUESS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE? MAYBE THERE IS AND I HAVE MISSED THE INSTRUCTIONS. CEIM2634</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11384</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11384</guid>
		<description>I know that Ancestry won´t act but I want to say what I think of this mess and I´m going to do so when Ancestry shows up at the national genealogical meeting here in Sweden in August. I´ve also been talking to my local genealogical society about this and they were appaled (spelling?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Ancestry won´t act but I want to say what I think of this mess and I´m going to do so when Ancestry shows up at the national genealogical meeting here in Sweden in August. I´ve also been talking to my local genealogical society about this and they were appaled (spelling?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Lamphier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Lamphier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11159</guid>
		<description>I see all thes complaints with various portions and policies of Ancestry.com but I dont see any response from them. You folks are just venting. Dont expect any desired changes or corrections to your own data to take place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see all thes complaints with various portions and policies of Ancestry.com but I dont see any response from them. You folks are just venting. Dont expect any desired changes or corrections to your own data to take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUDY ADAMS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11025</link>
		<dc:creator>JUDY ADAMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-11025</guid>
		<description>hi
i have been doing much the same thing 
recently some one in one of englands genealogy magazines made much the same comment as yourself. well needless to say i sent in a replie abut the possible way that her data had been corupted stating mind had too and laid the blame at ancestrys door. result the mag has said they hope to publish my letter soon. as the mag is available on subscription all over the world. maybe if my letter does get into the mag it will make ancestry take stock on just what a mess ONE WORLD TREE is causing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
i have been doing much the same thing<br />
recently some one in one of englands genealogy magazines made much the same comment as yourself. well needless to say i sent in a replie abut the possible way that her data had been corupted stating mind had too and laid the blame at ancestrys door. result the mag has said they hope to publish my letter soon. as the mag is available on subscription all over the world. maybe if my letter does get into the mag it will make ancestry take stock on just what a mess ONE WORLD TREE is causing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10981</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10981</guid>
		<description>Well, i posted my Ancestry-problem on the Swedish site and I have already gotten reactions. Seems like the society has some kind of co-operation with Ancestry so a fellow researcher suggested that it would be something for the Swedish society to handle. I have to see if it works. I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i posted my Ancestry-problem on the Swedish site and I have already gotten reactions. Seems like the society has some kind of co-operation with Ancestry so a fellow researcher suggested that it would be something for the Swedish society to handle. I have to see if it works. I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10972</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10972</guid>
		<description>Hi Judy

I live in Sweden and the banks here know how to get paid. Some of the fees they take out....

I´m just SO ANGRY that somewhere on this site (or somewhere else) is a copy of my tree with MY ancestors with totally false data. I WONT LET THIS GO UNTIL THIS IS FIXED IN SOMEWAY. IF my tree is going to be out there it should at least have the right birthdate, deathyear and the RIGHT PLACES where it all took place!
So I´m going to protest wherever I can. I´m also going to write on the Swedish genealogical society´s site about this and warn them about Ancestry. This is not acceptable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judy</p>
<p>I live in Sweden and the banks here know how to get paid. Some of the fees they take out&#8230;.</p>
<p>I´m just SO ANGRY that somewhere on this site (or somewhere else) is a copy of my tree with MY ancestors with totally false data. I WONT LET THIS GO UNTIL THIS IS FIXED IN SOMEWAY. IF my tree is going to be out there it should at least have the right birthdate, deathyear and the RIGHT PLACES where it all took place!<br />
So I´m going to protest wherever I can. I´m also going to write on the Swedish genealogical society´s site about this and warn them about Ancestry. This is not acceptable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUDY ADAMS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10967</link>
		<dc:creator>JUDY ADAMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10967</guid>
		<description>hi anna 
i live in england too

mastercard (along with others)are doing a card where you dont need to have a bank account. you just put the amount on to the card you want to and then use it like a credit card. give our ancestry help line a call to find out if they accept this card on the number below they are good

0800 404 9723

i am lucky as my mother pays mine on her card and i pay her. is this an option for you. but remember if you dont wish to continuee after a year you must let them know they do send you a reminder anyway.

have you loged into ancestry co.uk with your user name? 
you can get pay per view card from the link on the page.

also try your local lib&#039; the cenral one in your area should be able to tell you if they have free access to ancestry you might find they have the pay per view cards also. 

judy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi anna<br />
i live in england too</p>
<p>mastercard (along with others)are doing a card where you dont need to have a bank account. you just put the amount on to the card you want to and then use it like a credit card. give our ancestry help line a call to find out if they accept this card on the number below they are good</p>
<p>0800 404 9723</p>
<p>i am lucky as my mother pays mine on her card and i pay her. is this an option for you. but remember if you dont wish to continuee after a year you must let them know they do send you a reminder anyway.</p>
<p>have you loged into ancestry co.uk with your user name?<br />
you can get pay per view card from the link on the page.</p>
<p>also try your local lib&#8217; the cenral one in your area should be able to tell you if they have free access to ancestry you might find they have the pay per view cards also. </p>
<p>judy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10946</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10946</guid>
		<description>hi judy

Thanks for input. Problem is that I can post anything on someone elses tree cause I´m not a paying member. I don´t even have access to them. 
I have to have a creditcard, which I don´t have, to pay the subscription. To post a cheque to Ancestry is even more expensive than the subscription-fee cause the bank has to write it out. To be an overseas member sucks.

In my tree they have &quot;harvested&quot; my names, birthyear, deathyear (exactly) then added other parishes provinces or countries if I haven´t written it into the tree. In my dialouge with Ancestry I told them that the name Ola Nilsson is not found in Denmark in that case it would have been Ole Nielsen. But it´s been like hitting a brick wall. No help at all. 
I though accuracy was the lead star word in genealogy but it seems like money rules the world, s***w accurate.  Well, I won´t post another name in my tree or any other info as long as my info´s security on the Ancestry site is lousy. I´m really sorry about that cause I really liked My Tree. It was a way to make contact with other researchers all over the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi judy</p>
<p>Thanks for input. Problem is that I can post anything on someone elses tree cause I´m not a paying member. I don´t even have access to them.<br />
I have to have a creditcard, which I don´t have, to pay the subscription. To post a cheque to Ancestry is even more expensive than the subscription-fee cause the bank has to write it out. To be an overseas member sucks.</p>
<p>In my tree they have &#8220;harvested&#8221; my names, birthyear, deathyear (exactly) then added other parishes provinces or countries if I haven´t written it into the tree. In my dialouge with Ancestry I told them that the name Ola Nilsson is not found in Denmark in that case it would have been Ole Nielsen. But it´s been like hitting a brick wall. No help at all.<br />
I though accuracy was the lead star word in genealogy but it seems like money rules the world, s***w accurate.  Well, I won´t post another name in my tree or any other info as long as my info´s security on the Ancestry site is lousy. I´m really sorry about that cause I really liked My Tree. It was a way to make contact with other researchers all over the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUDY ADAMS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10911</link>
		<dc:creator>JUDY ADAMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/05/07/on-the-road/#comment-10911</guid>
		<description>ANNA

the likly hood is that your tree found is way into ONE WORLD TREE after you submitted it to either ancestry olt/amt OR rootsweb world connect. 

how 

well when ONE WORLD TREE was first launch we THE SUBSCRIBERS were alowed to upload / deleat our own tree to the program BUT then ancestry took away OUR abillity TO DO SO and took over the tree them selves so that ONLY ANCESTRY programers could controll this. at the same time ancestry HARVESTED the trees of of ROOTSWEB and added all the trees they had in their archive and added every one of them to ONE WORLD TREE.

Unfortunetly ONE WORLD TREE is a crock of s*** when it comes to a resorce because what it does is find two names which match and have AN APROXIMETLY THE SAME DATE OF BIRTH or even a missing birth date(some times christening marriage death or burial) it ignors the place data even if one like ours is born in another country it then joins the two people together creating a totaly wrong 3rd tree made up of some data from both trees.

then the new unexpireanced of just plain slopy amoug us accept the data as fact &#039;saying to them selves well its on ancestry so its correct and any one who says its not well they have it wrong&#039; to be fair a few do learn and amend the trees they have when you present them with your data 

what i do now is place a prewriten peice on all the trees i find any where on the nett (unfortunetly these wrong trees have been migrated to other sites) each time i have new data i add that as well.

a few people must be really fed up with me now but i do get results now and then from the ones i have emailed in the past with yet new data who apologise and conceid that i was right all along. but while that crock of s*hit ONE WORLD TREE remains it s an up hill struggle. but ...

so i expect your tree has been curupted in this way and you can either go down my avinuee and post your tree in the correct form every where you can and email / place notes on each tree you find which is wrong


ANCESTRY THIS IS THE PROBLEM THAT YOU ARE CREATING WITH THE ONE WORLD TREE IT SOULD BE REMOVED NOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANNA</p>
<p>the likly hood is that your tree found is way into ONE WORLD TREE after you submitted it to either ancestry olt/amt OR rootsweb world connect. </p>
<p>how </p>
<p>well when ONE WORLD TREE was first launch we THE SUBSCRIBERS were alowed to upload / deleat our own tree to the program BUT then ancestry took away OUR abillity TO DO SO and took over the tree them selves so that ONLY ANCESTRY programers could controll this. at the same time ancestry HARVESTED the trees of of ROOTSWEB and added all the trees they had in their archive and added every one of them to ONE WORLD TREE.</p>
<p>Unfortunetly ONE WORLD TREE is a crock of s*** when it comes to a resorce because what it does is find two names which match and have AN APROXIMETLY THE SAME DATE OF BIRTH or even a missing birth date(some times christening marriage death or burial) it ignors the place data even if one like ours is born in another country it then joins the two people together creating a totaly wrong 3rd tree made up of some data from both trees.</p>
<p>then the new unexpireanced of just plain slopy amoug us accept the data as fact &#8216;saying to them selves well its on ancestry so its correct and any one who says its not well they have it wrong&#8217; to be fair a few do learn and amend the trees they have when you present them with your data </p>
<p>what i do now is place a prewriten peice on all the trees i find any where on the nett (unfortunetly these wrong trees have been migrated to other sites) each time i have new data i add that as well.</p>
<p>a few people must be really fed up with me now but i do get results now and then from the ones i have emailed in the past with yet new data who apologise and conceid that i was right all along. but while that crock of s*hit ONE WORLD TREE remains it s an up hill struggle. but &#8230;</p>
<p>so i expect your tree has been curupted in this way and you can either go down my avinuee and post your tree in the correct form every where you can and email / place notes on each tree you find which is wrong</p>
<p>ANCESTRY THIS IS THE PROBLEM THAT YOU ARE CREATING WITH THE ONE WORLD TREE IT SOULD BE REMOVED NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
