<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-next-patch</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh mccurry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-32568</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh mccurry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-32568</guid>
		<description>how do i get into ftmdata</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do i get into ftmdata</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie McLennan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-26379</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie McLennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-26379</guid>
		<description>The more I do detailed searches in the different available historical records the more I find that that records exist that I didn&#039;t know were there. An index and quick link to reach these various records would be helpful. Right now, for example, if I want to get to the Irish Flax Growers List I have to scroll through many pages of available records to get to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I do detailed searches in the different available historical records the more I find that that records exist that I didn&#8217;t know were there. An index and quick link to reach these various records would be helpful. Right now, for example, if I want to get to the Irish Flax Growers List I have to scroll through many pages of available records to get to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Siner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-25402</link>
		<dc:creator>William Siner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-25402</guid>
		<description>I have just purchased Familytreemaker
2009, and although I have a very good internet connection. My familytreemaker will not connect to the internet. It keeps coming up with authentication to server failed. I only bought the 2009 version on the 4Nov 2008 from Genealogy Supplies my Computor is the vista version, can you please help me with this problem.
          William Siner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just purchased Familytreemaker<br />
2009, and although I have a very good internet connection. My familytreemaker will not connect to the internet. It keeps coming up with authentication to server failed. I only bought the 2009 version on the 4Nov 2008 from Genealogy Supplies my Computor is the vista version, can you please help me with this problem.<br />
          William Siner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-13465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-13465</guid>
		<description>OK fine! I just wasted 5 hours of work. The backup file I have been making for months seems to be useless. Is there ever going to come a time when TGN can be trusted? It doesn&#039;t work? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK fine! I just wasted 5 hours of work. The backup file I have been making for months seems to be useless. Is there ever going to come a time when TGN can be trusted? It doesn&#8217;t work? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>In the final line of my penultimate paragraph I &quot;miswrote&quot; the word &quot;presemce.&quot; I should have said I dislike the &quot;absence&quot; of the book feature in v16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final line of my penultimate paragraph I &#8220;miswrote&#8221; the word &#8220;presemce.&#8221; I should have said I dislike the &#8220;absence&#8221; of the book feature in v16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6467</guid>
		<description>Re Clovis LaFleur 2-4-08, No. 79.

Clovis

I, too, used/use the &quot;compose in Word, Copy, Paste&quot; method for my Family History book.

Besides not working worth a d... I missed the &quot;Book&quot; feature of v16 in the new 2008. After trying tech support several times I finally sent my 2008 back for a refund.

Am hoping for a complete &quot;back to square one&quot; rewrite that will produce a usable product. Meanwhile I am waiting for the new update to Legacy, v7, that will be out soon. I have Legacy v5 and v6 and like them very much, especially the tech support, and dislike the presence of a &quot;Book&quot; feature like FTM v16.

I am a FTM user back to Banner Blue but it looks like TGN s driving FTM users away in droves and will no longer be in business one of these days.

Ernie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Clovis LaFleur 2-4-08, No. 79.</p>
<p>Clovis</p>
<p>I, too, used/use the &#8220;compose in Word, Copy, Paste&#8221; method for my Family History book.</p>
<p>Besides not working worth a d&#8230; I missed the &#8220;Book&#8221; feature of v16 in the new 2008. After trying tech support several times I finally sent my 2008 back for a refund.</p>
<p>Am hoping for a complete &#8220;back to square one&#8221; rewrite that will produce a usable product. Meanwhile I am waiting for the new update to Legacy, v7, that will be out soon. I have Legacy v5 and v6 and like them very much, especially the tech support, and dislike the presence of a &#8220;Book&#8221; feature like FTM v16.</p>
<p>I am a FTM user back to Banner Blue but it looks like TGN s driving FTM users away in droves and will no longer be in business one of these days.</p>
<p>Ernie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea Mitchem-Wade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea Mitchem-Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>Would like to sign up to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to sign up to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6340</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-6340</guid>
		<description>I was just on the main Ancestry.com web site, and an ad appeared for the new version of Family Tree Maker 2008. It states in large, bold letters, &quot;New charts. New reports. Better performance.&quot; In light of what I&#039;ve read here, it sounds like this is nothing short of deceptive advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just on the main Ancestry.com web site, and an ad appeared for the new version of Family Tree Maker 2008. It states in large, bold letters, &#8220;New charts. New reports. Better performance.&#8221; In light of what I&#8217;ve read here, it sounds like this is nothing short of deceptive advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>I use multiple genealogy programs, one being FTM. FTM is not my main program, but I did use it for the great charting capabilities. What a shock, when I finally got around to updating some all in one charts, I find that it is gone! I am very disappointed.

I also found that a patch was available (559), but the automatic check for updates said I was up to date. I had to manually download and install.

I will be going back to the older version to get the charting capabilities I had.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use multiple genealogy programs, one being FTM. FTM is not my main program, but I did use it for the great charting capabilities. What a shock, when I finally got around to updating some all in one charts, I find that it is gone! I am very disappointed.</p>
<p>I also found that a patch was available (559), but the automatic check for updates said I was up to date. I had to manually download and install.</p>
<p>I will be going back to the older version to get the charting capabilities I had.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Clouse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>James Clouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2008/01/10/the-next-patch/#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>Bill,

If you imported from 2006 into 2008, then that file is still intact.

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>If you imported from 2006 into 2008, then that file is still intact.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
