<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ancestry Hints – New and Improved</title>
	<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Ancestry.com</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: richards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-26983</link>
		<dc:creator>richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-26983</guid>
		<description>hi
BATA TEST BEFORE PUTTING IT ON THE WEB OR DO YOU KNOW HOW TO BATA TEST
ASK ANY 12 year old he can tell you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
BATA TEST BEFORE PUTTING IT ON THE WEB OR DO YOU KNOW HOW TO BATA TEST<br />
ASK ANY 12 year old he can tell you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Hill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-13861</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-13861</guid>
		<description>A lot of my earlier ancestors is missing.  I had over 1500 individuals in my other tree, and this one only has 217.  Where is the rest of my family?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of my earlier ancestors is missing.  I had over 1500 individuals in my other tree, and this one only has 217.  Where is the rest of my family?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary S. Collins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-12802</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary S. Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-12802</guid>
		<description>I happened for the first time just now on this "blog" about "hints" in the "new" Ancestry member Tree (AMT) system.

After looking over most messages, there is a clear consensus that the "hints" feature in the new AMT system is highly defective:  it's slow and attaches junk to your file that is tedious to remove.  

Contrast that with the "old" Online Family Tree (OFT) system.  The hints feature in OFT allows one to search for related information.  There is no automatic "merge" feature, but that is absolutely desirable when one wishes to view and evaluate each hint.  

Readers should know that the "old" OFT system also makes your ancestry file available to the public--and not just to Ancestry.com subscribers.

I urge Ancestry.com to sustain the "old" OFT system for those who have found (and will find) it an effective tool for developing stand-alone genealogical ancestry files.

I don't have any recommendation for improvement of the AMT system since it seems to be clearly so crippled in terms of utility and accessibility that I and many, relatively experienced developers of personal ancestry files would never use it.


Sincerely,

Gary Collins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happened for the first time just now on this &#8220;blog&#8221; about &#8220;hints&#8221; in the &#8220;new&#8221; Ancestry member Tree (AMT) system.</p>
<p>After looking over most messages, there is a clear consensus that the &#8220;hints&#8221; feature in the new AMT system is highly defective:  it&#8217;s slow and attaches junk to your file that is tedious to remove.  </p>
<p>Contrast that with the &#8220;old&#8221; Online Family Tree (OFT) system.  The hints feature in OFT allows one to search for related information.  There is no automatic &#8220;merge&#8221; feature, but that is absolutely desirable when one wishes to view and evaluate each hint.  </p>
<p>Readers should know that the &#8220;old&#8221; OFT system also makes your ancestry file available to the public&#8211;and not just to Ancestry.com subscribers.</p>
<p>I urge Ancestry.com to sustain the &#8220;old&#8221; OFT system for those who have found (and will find) it an effective tool for developing stand-alone genealogical ancestry files.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any recommendation for improvement of the AMT system since it seems to be clearly so crippled in terms of utility and accessibility that I and many, relatively experienced developers of personal ancestry files would never use it.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Gary Collins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-10818</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-10818</guid>
		<description>It's really frustrating to get hints that have no information in them, and I am unable to ignore. Please address this issue, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really frustrating to get hints that have no information in them, and I am unable to ignore. Please address this issue, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen zaslona</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-9630</link>
		<dc:creator>helen zaslona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-9630</guid>
		<description>this is the greatest thing since...I've forgotten the saying...but it is great because sometimes they have more info and sometime you have more than them but atleast you can take what you want and leave the rest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the greatest thing since&#8230;I&#8217;ve forgotten the saying&#8230;but it is great because sometimes they have more info and sometime you have more than them but atleast you can take what you want and leave the rest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donald. hughes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-7634</link>
		<dc:creator>donald. hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-7634</guid>
		<description>great improvement, please accept my congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great improvement, please accept my congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blaine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-7603</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-7603</guid>
		<description>When is the family merge process going to be fixed? Are we getting a new merge feature? This one has been broke for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the family merge process going to be fixed? Are we getting a new merge feature? This one has been broke for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judy adams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-6789</link>
		<dc:creator>judy adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-6789</guid>
		<description>ok
so where is the coment that i made on this topic gone to which lisa in message 50 left ananswer

looks as if i have been censored for giving an opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok<br />
so where is the coment that i made on this topic gone to which lisa in message 50 left ananswer</p>
<p>looks as if i have been censored for giving an opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen alcott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-6474</link>
		<dc:creator>karen alcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-6474</guid>
		<description>I personally love the new "hints".(green leaf) Yes, you must be careful using them, but it allows one to compare and confirm information. The UNFORTUNATE part is I only compared and used information about the sibs related to me...when I went back to complete the family information. I found the hints had disappeared! Can we please bring 
that option back???? Nowhere did it say these would disappear after using it one time. I have emailed the help line on how to get this information back. Noone replies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love the new &#8220;hints&#8221;.(green leaf) Yes, you must be careful using them, but it allows one to compare and confirm information. The UNFORTUNATE part is I only compared and used information about the sibs related to me&#8230;when I went back to complete the family information. I found the hints had disappeared! Can we please bring<br />
that option back???? Nowhere did it say these would disappear after using it one time. I have emailed the help line on how to get this information back. Noone replies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou page</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>lou page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/2007/12/20/ancestry-hints-%e2%80%93-new-and-improved/#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>all well and good these new singing and dancing features but i still cannot download a genuine gedcon file that will up load to genesreunited,no matter how much i try. i run both sites and had no problem importing from their gedcom.i have tried 4 times to export my tree and non of the files say thet are a "GEDCOM" 
i NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE this is driving me crazy!
Regards
Lou</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all well and good these new singing and dancing features but i still cannot download a genuine gedcon file that will up load to genesreunited,no matter how much i try. i run both sites and had no problem importing from their gedcom.i have tried 4 times to export my tree and non of the files say thet are a &#8220;GEDCOM&#8221;<br />
i NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE this is driving me crazy!<br />
Regards<br />
Lou</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
