5 Hidden Questions in the U.S. Federal Census

Posted by Linda Barnickel on August 24, 2016 in Research

It doesn’t take long for even a beginning genealogist to recognize the value of federal population census schedules. Tracing a family or individual back through censuses, taken every ten years, makes building a family tree or pedigree relatively easy. But within these schedules, even experienced researchers may forget or overlook these “hidden” questions from certain census years.

Revolutionary War Pensioner

The 1840 census – famously frustrating for its nameless “tick mark” approach to enumerating household members, nevertheless asks two key questions: the name of any Revolutionary War pensioners in the household, and their age. Often, the name of the pensioner is different than the head of household, as in this example from Lyons Township, Wayne County, New York, where Revolutionary War veteran Benjamin Avery, age 82, is in the household headed by Cyrus Avery. Benjamin’s information is easy to miss because it is on the second page of the census, far to the right of all of the white, free persons of color and slaves in the household. In the case of the Averys, Benjamin is enumerated with a tick mark in the “white male, age 80 to 90” category, and it seems probable that Cyrus is the “white male, age 50 to 60”. Although it is by no means certain, and would require additional research to confirm, it seems likely that Benjamin may be Cyrus’ father. By having Benjamin’s name listed on this census as a Revolutionary War pensioner (not just a veteran), the next logical step would be to look for a pension record for him, which undoubtedly should contain much more information.

RevWar1840-CAverymarkupRevWar1840-BAvery

Fugitive Slaves

On both the 1850 and 1860 slave schedules, in a column just following the “color” designation, is a column headed “Fugitives from the State”. This is a reference to runaway slaves. This column is usually empty, and can therefore be easy to miss, but if there is a tick mark there, be sure to follow the lead. Because only the name of the slaveholder appears in the census, use that as a lead to search out other resources. Examine local newspapers for runaway notices. Consult court records which might have resulted from a variety of circumstances related to the runaway incident, such as a claim for a reward, a dispute over slave ownership, jailor’s or sheriff’s fees for capturing and retaining the runaway slave, or a charge against an “agitator” who enticed the slave to flee. With both newspapers and court records, be sure to search in adjoining counties in the region, as well.

WmHCarrollFugitive1850Markup

 

Civil War Veteran

Many genealogists know that the only significant part of the 1890 census to survive is the special Union veterans schedule, for some of the states. But what if your part of the country was among the records lost to fire, or if your ancestor served in the Confederate Army? The 1910 census provides an alternate resource. Here, Samuel J. Churchill of Kansas is marked as a Union Army veteran – though the cryptic notation of “UA” is obscured, and jumbled in with other, unrelated markings from the census taker.

SamChurchillName1910markup

 

Illness and Disease

The 1880 census asks questions about a resident’s medical condition. In some cases, the ailment or symptoms may be written out; other conditions are designated by a tickmark. In Decatur County, Tennessee, farmer I. Thomas Lacy was suffering from “chills and fever” on the day of the census taker’s visit. A nearby neighbor, Phillip E. Luck, has a tickmark indicating that he was “maimed, crippled, bedridden, or otherwise disabled.”

1880DecaturMedicalmarkup

Foreigners Not Naturalized

Some genealogists may be aware of the citizenship and naturalization questions contained in later censuses, but the 1820 census has a column to indicate “foreigners not naturalized” as well. This question, like others that we’ve looked at, can be easy to miss because it is indicated simply by a tickmark.

Richard Hardwoody_1820 US Census

Conclusion

The above examples should demonstrate the importance of thoroughly examining every bit of information from each census – even for those census years that have a reputation for being less than helpful. A tickmark here, or a brief notation there, might provide you enough information to pursue other resources, or at a minimum, help you learn just a little bit more about your ancestors’ lives and circumstances.

Past Articles

Wanted! Criminals and reward systems revealed in new Irish Police Gazette records

Posted by Kristen Hyde on August 22, 2016 in Ancestry.com Site, Content, Ireland

Our new Irish Police Gazette records from 1863-1893 give fascinating insight into the crimes, wanted criminals, reward systems and missing persons in Ireland during the Victorian era. The Ireland, Police Gazettes, 1861-1893 records are extracted from ‘Hue and Cry’, the official publication of the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) which operated in Ireland from 1814-1922. ‘Hue Read More

Desperately Seeking a Place

Posted by Maureen Taylor on August 19, 2016 in In The Community

These pictures depict a timeless moment. Six people went on a sight seeing trip on a hazy summer day in the mid-1940s. One brought along a camera and they posed for candid photos. The photographer went home, had the pictures developed and placed them in an album. I bet your family did something like this Read More

Using WWI Registration Cards to trace your ancestors

Posted by Kristen Hyde on August 19, 2016 in Content, United Kingdom

Ancestry Content Acquisition Manager, Rhona Murray talks about the value of WWI registration cards in tracing your ancestors movements during this period. Start exploring our new WWI Registration Cards for Bexley on Ancestry. The first National Registration exercise in the United Kingdom was taken during the First World War. The National Registration Act came in Read More

Actor Kills Wife in Love Triangle And Other Family Secrets in the Daily News

Posted by Marjorie Waterfield on August 17, 2016 in Guest Bloggers

This article was originally published in Ancestry Magazine, Nov-Dec 2007. The Players [James] Edward Forshay—Actor. Born 1867 in Tennessee: THE MURDERER Edna Mae Stokes—Wife of Edward Forshay: THE PHILANDERER Vernon Johns—Hotel owner in Chicago and Edna Mae’s love interest: THE LOVER Jesse Forshay & Margaret “Texas” Pittman— Parents of Edward Forshay: THE PARENTS Anna Forshay Read More

How Science Solved a Romanian Mystery

Posted by Kristen Hyde on August 11, 2016 in AncestryDNA, Research, United Kingdom

Senior Manager of Content at Ancestry, Miriam Silverman, shares her experience researching her family history in Romania and how a DNA match repaired a broken branch of her family tree.  When you come from immigrant stock, it can be very difficult to trace your ancestry back very far. My dad’s dad came over to London as Read More

History of Nursing Captured in New Nursing Registers

Posted by Kristen Hyde on August 11, 2016 in Ancestry.com Site

Janet Davies, Royal College of Nursing Chief Executive and General Secretary, explores the new nursing register collection and shines a spotlight on the record of one of the RCN’s founders, Sarah Swift. The Nursing Registers are an incredibly significant collection – especially as they have been digitised during the Royal College of Nursing’s centenary year. Read More

Finding Canadian Lovebirds in Ontario Records

Posted by Ancestry Team on August 9, 2016 in Canada, Content

Analysis of historic visitor records from Niagara Falls has revealed how one of Canada’s top tourist destinations earned its reputation as the honeymoon capital of the world. Recent research shows that August is Canada’s most popular month to wed – and to celebrate the 500-year-old tradition of taking a vacation after the big day, Ancestry Read More